Author: Simusika, Paul; Tempia, Stefano; Chentulo, Edward; Polansky, Lauren; Mazaba, Mazyanga Lucy; Ndumba, Idah; Mbewe, Quinn K.; Monze, Mwaka
Title: An evaluation of the Zambia influenza sentinel surveillance system, 2011–2017 Document date: 2020_1_13
ID: 0pfrk5uk_32
Snippet: During the evaluation period, one timeliness indicator had good performance and one had moderate performance (Table 2 ). Approximately 25% of samples were not received or tested within the expected time period. 86.3% of the samples collected in Lusaka Province were received within the expected time period, whereas only 67.3% of the samples collected in the Copperbelt Province met the expected timeline. No significant difference in the proportion .....
Document: During the evaluation period, one timeliness indicator had good performance and one had moderate performance (Table 2 ). Approximately 25% of samples were not received or tested within the expected time period. 86.3% of the samples collected in Lusaka Province were received within the expected time period, whereas only 67.3% of the samples collected in the Copperbelt Province met the expected timeline. No significant difference in the proportion of samples positive for influenza was observed between the sites situated in Lusaka (9.0% 650/ 7207) and Ndola (8.1%; 244/3005) (p = 0.1429). The mean score for data timeliness was 2.5 (moderate to good performance) ( Table 1) .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- evaluation period and mean score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- evaluation period and moderate performance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- evaluation period and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4
- good performance and mean score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- good performance and moderate performance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- good performance and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date