Selected article for: "evaluation period and weak performance"

Author: Simusika, Paul; Tempia, Stefano; Chentulo, Edward; Polansky, Lauren; Mazaba, Mazyanga Lucy; Ndumba, Idah; Mbewe, Quinn K.; Monze, Mwaka
Title: An evaluation of the Zambia influenza sentinel surveillance system, 2011–2017
  • Document date: 2020_1_13
  • ID: 0pfrk5uk_47
    Snippet: During the evaluation period, the two indicators had poor performance (Table 5 ). Only 17% of the ISSS budget was provided by the Zambia MoH and the remaining by international agencies. The mean annual running cost of the system was approximately $310,000 ($105 per sample collected and tested in 2017). Whereas, a sustainability plan was drafted in 2015, the document was not finalized and implemented at the time of this evaluation. The mean score .....
    Document: During the evaluation period, the two indicators had poor performance (Table 5 ). Only 17% of the ISSS budget was provided by the Zambia MoH and the remaining by international agencies. The mean annual running cost of the system was approximately $310,000 ($105 per sample collected and tested in 2017). Whereas, a sustainability plan was drafted in 2015, the document was not finalized and implemented at the time of this evaluation. The mean score for sustainability was 1.0 (weak performance) ( Table 1 ).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • evaluation period and weak performance: 1, 2
    • evaluation period and Zambia moh: 1
    • evaluation time and mean score: 1
    • mean score and poor performance: 1, 2
    • mean score and weak performance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • mean score and Zambia moh: 1
    • poor performance and weak performance: 1
    • running cost and system running cost: 1