Selected article for: "acute infection and adhesin mutant"

Author: Klaile, Esther; Klassert, Tilman E; Scheffrahn, Inka; Müller, Mario M; Heinrich, Annina; Heyl, Kerstin A; Dienemann, Hendrik; Grünewald, Christiane; Bals, Robert; Singer, Bernhard B; Slevogt, Hortense
Title: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-related cell adhesion molecules are co-expressed in the human lung and their expression can be modulated in bronchial epithelial cells by non-typable Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, TLR3, and type I and II interferons
  • Document date: 2013_8_14
  • ID: 1fmsipqu_50
    Snippet: Next, the effects of acute NTHi and Moraxella catarrhalis infection on CEACAM1, CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 mRNA expression levels in NHBE cells were investigated ( Figure 5 ). qPCR analysis revealed no differences in CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 expression upon bacterial infection. The M. catarrhalis wild type strains 25238 and BBH18 as well as the NTHi wild type strains 2019 and 1128 enhanced the mRNA expression of all four transmembrane CEACAM1-isoforms to a s.....
    Document: Next, the effects of acute NTHi and Moraxella catarrhalis infection on CEACAM1, CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 mRNA expression levels in NHBE cells were investigated ( Figure 5 ). qPCR analysis revealed no differences in CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 expression upon bacterial infection. The M. catarrhalis wild type strains 25238 and BBH18 as well as the NTHi wild type strains 2019 and 1128 enhanced the mRNA expression of all four transmembrane CEACAM1-isoforms to a similar degree in a co-regulatory manner ( Figure 5A,B,D,E) . The mean induction of CEACAM1 transcription by M. catarrhalis strains was twice as high as by NTHi strains (3.5-5.5 fold vs. 1.9-2.8 fold). Since all four pathogens can bind to CEACAM1, we next tested whether this interaction was essential to the up-regulation of CEACAM1. To that end we used the M. catarrhalis UspA deletion mutant BBH18.1 and the NTHi P5 deletion mutant 1128f-, which both lack the respective CEACAM1-binding adhesin ( Figure 5C,F) . Again, the infection with these strains induced an elevated CEACAM1 expression (4.0-4.9 fold and 1.9-2.4 fold, respectively) comparable to their parental strains, indicating a CEACAM1-independent, more general mechanism for this effect. We then tested whether the CEACAM1 upregulation might be due to an increase in interferons. Both

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • bacterial infection and CEACAM1 expression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • bacterial infection and CEACAM1 regulation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • bacterial infection and CEACAM1 upregulation: 1
    • bacterial infection and expression level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • bacterial infection and fold fold: 1, 2
    • bacterial infection expression and CEACAM1 bind: 1
    • bacterial infection expression and CEACAM1 expression: 1
    • bacterial infection expression and CEACAM1 regulation: 1
    • bacterial infection expression and expression level: 1, 2
    • catarrhalis wild type and CEACAM1 bind: 1
    • CEACAM1 expression and expression level: 1, 2, 3
    • CEACAM1 expression and fold fold: 1
    • CEACAM1 regulation and expression level: 1
    • CEACAM1 regulation and fold fold: 1
    • CEACAM1 upregulation and expression level: 1
    • CEACAM1 upregulation and fold fold: 1