Author: Li, Guanghua; Wang, Na; Sun, Chuanjin; Li, Bo
Title: Decreased expression of eukaryotic initiation factor 3f is an adverse prognostic factor for stage I–III gastric cancer Document date: 2014_3_28
ID: 1hps5owh_9
Snippet: Differences between groups were analyzed using a Student's t-test for continuous variables and a χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test for proportions. The overall survival rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses (Cox proportional hazard regression models) were also performed to assess the prognostic value of nucleolin expression and other clinicopathological features. We utilized SAS 9.2 software system for statistical anal.....
Document: Differences between groups were analyzed using a Student's t-test for continuous variables and a χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test for proportions. The overall survival rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses (Cox proportional hazard regression models) were also performed to assess the prognostic value of nucleolin expression and other clinicopathological features. We utilized SAS 9.2 software system for statistical analysis.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- continuous variable and Cox proportional hazard regression model: 1
- continuous variable and exact test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- continuous variable and group difference: 1
- continuous variable and hazard regression: 1, 2
- continuous variable and hazard regression model: 1
- Cox proportional hazard regression model and exact test: 1
- Cox proportional hazard regression model and group difference: 1
- Cox proportional hazard regression model and hazard regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38
- Cox proportional hazard regression model and hazard regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38
- Cox proportional hazard regression model and Kaplan Meier method: 1, 2, 3, 4
- exact test and group difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- exact test and hazard regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
- exact test and hazard regression model: 1
- exact test and Kaplan Meier method: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- group difference and hazard regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
- group difference and hazard regression model: 1, 2
- group difference and Kaplan Meier method: 1, 2
- hazard regression and Kaplan Meier method: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- hazard regression model and Kaplan Meier method: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date