Selected article for: "diagnostic method and sensitive diagnostic method"

Author: Nakamura, Shota; Yang, Cheng-Song; Sakon, Naomi; Ueda, Mayo; Tougan, Takahiro; Yamashita, Akifumi; Goto, Naohisa; Takahashi, Kazuo; Yasunaga, Teruo; Ikuta, Kazuyoshi; Mizutani, Tetsuya; Okamoto, Yoshiko; Tagami, Michihira; Morita, Ryoji; Maeda, Norihiro; Kawai, Jun; Hayashizaki, Yoshihide; Nagai, Yoshiyuki; Horii, Toshihiro; Iida, Tetsuya; Nakaya, Takaaki
Title: Direct Metagenomic Detection of Viral Pathogens in Nasal and Fecal Specimens Using an Unbiased High-Throughput Sequencing Approach
  • Document date: 2009_1_19
  • ID: 1j8z8lak_15
    Snippet: To remove bacteria and human cells present in the feces, 15,000 rpm centrifugation was performed and the supernatants were used for RNA isolation. The norovirus sequence was detected from all five samples in 15,298-32,335 (average 23,994) reads, as summarized in Table 3 . In contrast with influenza virus, almost the whole genome was covered in #N2 (7,302 reads) and #N3 (15,260 reads) samples, with average cover depths of 141.5 and 258.7, respecti.....
    Document: To remove bacteria and human cells present in the feces, 15,000 rpm centrifugation was performed and the supernatants were used for RNA isolation. The norovirus sequence was detected from all five samples in 15,298-32,335 (average 23,994) reads, as summarized in Table 3 . In contrast with influenza virus, almost the whole genome was covered in #N2 (7,302 reads) and #N3 (15,260 reads) samples, with average cover depths of 141.5 and 258.7, respectively (Table 3 ). More than 75% of the genome was covered in #N4 (484 reads) and #N5 (611 reads) samples (Table 3) . A BLAST search of each sequence strongly indicated that these four patients were infected with a similar genotype, GII.4 (Table S2) , consistent with previous diagnostic results [26] . In contrast, only 7 reads were detected in sample #N1 (Table 3) , which was under-detectable with single round of PCR ( Figure 1C ), suggesting that the diagnostic method using high-throughput pyrosequencing is more sensitive than conventional PCR analysis.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • blast search and PCR analysis: 1, 2, 3
    • conventional PCR analysis and high throughput: 1, 2, 3
    • conventional PCR analysis and influenza virus: 1, 2, 3
    • conventional PCR analysis and PCR analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • diagnostic method and high throughput: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
    • diagnostic method and human cell: 1, 2
    • diagnostic method and influenza virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • diagnostic method and PCR analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • diagnostic result and high throughput: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • diagnostic result and human cell: 1
    • diagnostic result and influenza virus: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • diagnostic result and PCR analysis: 1
    • high throughput and human cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • high throughput and influenza virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • high throughput and norovirus sequence: 1, 2
    • high throughput and PCR analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • human cell and influenza virus contrast: 1
    • human cell and norovirus sequence: 1
    • human cell and PCR analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10