Selected article for: "false negative and individual sample"

Author: Schanzer, Dena L.; Garner, Michael J.; Hatchette, Todd F.; Langley, Joanne M.; Aziz, Samina; Tam, Theresa W. S.
Title: Estimating Sensitivity of Laboratory Testing for Influenza in Canada through Modelling
  • Document date: 2009_8_18
  • ID: 06boh550_19
    Snippet: The large variation in false negative rates estimated for individual laboratories reporting to the RVDSS suggests that standardization of sample procurement, testing and reporting procedures would likely reduce the overall false negative rate. The accuracy of diagnostic tests is known to be affected by the quality of the specimen [10, 11] , its handling, the timing of collection after symptom onset, and the age of the patient [14, 15] . Even with.....
    Document: The large variation in false negative rates estimated for individual laboratories reporting to the RVDSS suggests that standardization of sample procurement, testing and reporting procedures would likely reduce the overall false negative rate. The accuracy of diagnostic tests is known to be affected by the quality of the specimen [10, 11] , its handling, the timing of collection after symptom onset, and the age of the patient [14, 15] . Even with the most sensitive molecular methodologies, yield was shown to be strongly related to the time since onset of symptoms [9, 14] , with a 3-fold decline in proportion positive within 3 to 5 days after onset of symptoms for both RT-PCR and culture procedures. For most laboratory tests, specimen procurement within 72 hours of from the onset of symptoms is recommended [6] , yet patients often present much later in the course of illness. Estimates of the median time since onset of symptoms suggest a delay of 3 and 5 days for outpatient and inpatients respectively [15] , however these estimates are limited to patients with laboratory confirmed influenza. In addition, there are inherent differences in the performance characteristics of the currently used diagnostic tests [4, 6, 8, [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] . Lack of standardization between diagnostic tests and algorithms used in different laboratories reporting to the RVDSS adds to this complexity. The routine use of RT-PCR testing has only recently become available in Canada (only 20% of tests used RT-PCR methods as of 2005/06 [23] ), but increased use of this modality is expected to improve accuracy.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accuracy improve and diagnostic test accuracy: 1, 2
    • accuracy improve and false negative rate: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accuracy improve and laboratory patient: 1
    • accuracy improve and laboratory test: 1
    • accuracy improve and large variation: 1, 2
    • accuracy improve and median time: 1, 2
    • accuracy improve and negative rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • accuracy improve and patient age: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accuracy improve and performance characteristic: 1, 2
    • accuracy improve and positive proportion: 1, 2, 3
    • accuracy improve and RT PCR method: 1, 2
    • accuracy improve and RT PCR testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • accuracy improve and symptom onset: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • algorithm diagnostic test and diagnostic test: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • algorithm diagnostic test and laboratory test: 1
    • algorithm diagnostic test and patient age: 1, 2
    • algorithm diagnostic test and RT PCR testing: 1