Selected article for: "factor model and scoring method"
Author: Toyabe, Shin-ichi; Shioiri, Toshiki; Kobayashi, Kuriko; Kuwabara, Hideki; Koizumi, Masataka; Endo, Taro; Ito, Miki; Honma, Hiroko; Fukushima, Noboru; Someya, Toshiyuki; Akazawa, Kouhei
Title: Factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in subjects who had suffered from the 2004 Niigata-Chuetsu Earthquake in Japan: a community-based study
  • Document date: 2007_7_24
    • ID: 1pr9q0ww_16
    Snippet: Relative frequency polygons for GHQ-12 score Figure 1 Relative frequency polygons for GHQ-12 score. GHQ-12 was scored by three different methods. In each method of scoring, the proportions of subjects with each score were plotted. Vertical dotted lines indicated the cutoff points for each scoring method. terms of scoring methods, clinical groups and different cultures [5] . However, the structure of the proposed model was very similar to that of .....
    Document: Relative frequency polygons for GHQ-12 score Figure 1 Relative frequency polygons for GHQ-12 score. GHQ-12 was scored by three different methods. In each method of scoring, the proportions of subjects with each score were plotted. Vertical dotted lines indicated the cutoff points for each scoring method. terms of scoring methods, clinical groups and different cultures [5] . However, the structure of the proposed model was very similar to that of a model developed by Doi, who assessed the factor structure of GHQ-12 in the Japanese general adult population [1] . The similarity in structure of models in their study and our study suggests that this model might be suitable for a survey in the Japanese population.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • adult population and cutoff point: 1, 2
    • adult population and different method: 1
    • adult population and factor structure: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • adult population and general adult population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • adult population and japanese general adult population: 1
    • adult population and japanese population: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • adult population and propose model: 1, 2
    • adult population and relative frequency: 1
    • clinical group and cutoff point: 1
    • clinical group and different method: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • clinical group and factor structure: 1
    • clinical group and factor structure assess: 1
    • clinical group and propose model: 1
    • clinical group and relative frequency: 1
    • different culture and dotted line: 1
    • different method and factor structure: 1, 2
    • different method and general adult population: 1
    • different method and propose model: 1, 2, 3
    • different method and score method: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6