Author: Toyabe, Shin-ichi; Shioiri, Toshiki; Kobayashi, Kuriko; Kuwabara, Hideki; Koizumi, Masataka; Endo, Taro; Ito, Miki; Honma, Hiroko; Fukushima, Noboru; Someya, Toshiyuki; Akazawa, Kouhei
Title: Factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in subjects who had suffered from the 2004 Niigata-Chuetsu Earthquake in Japan: a community-based study Document date: 2007_7_24
ID: 1pr9q0ww_15
Snippet: We previously reported that a model consisting of the two factors showed a high level of goodness-of-fit in a survey of subjects who had experienced the Niigata-Chuetsu Earthquake at five months after the earthquake [16] . The proposed two-factor model also showed a good fit to the results of the survey of subjects two years after the earthquake. There has been debate as to whether GHQ is a unidimensional or multi-dimensional measure [3] [4] [5] .....
Document: We previously reported that a model consisting of the two factors showed a high level of goodness-of-fit in a survey of subjects who had experienced the Niigata-Chuetsu Earthquake at five months after the earthquake [16] . The proposed two-factor model also showed a good fit to the results of the survey of subjects two years after the earthquake. There has been debate as to whether GHQ is a unidimensional or multi-dimensional measure [3] [4] [5] [6] . Our results regarding model fitting showed that the proposed two-factor model was superior to the one-factor model and models consisting of three or more factors (data not shown) [5, 7] . The two-factor structure in the present study was quite stable regardless of the differences in scoring methods and sampling time. In general, the factor structure of GHQ-12 has provided quite different results in
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- different result and factor structure: 1
- different result and good fit: 1
- different result and high level: 1, 2
- factor model and fit goodness: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- factor model and good fit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- factor model and high level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- factor model and model fitting: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- factor structure and fit goodness: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- factor structure and good fit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- factor structure and high level: 1, 2, 3, 4
- factor structure and model fitting: 1, 2, 3
- fit goodness and good fit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- fit goodness and high level: 1
- fit goodness and model fitting: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- good fit and model fitting: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- high level and model fitting: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date