Selected article for: "exploratory factor and factor model"

Author: Toyabe, Shin-ichi; Shioiri, Toshiki; Kobayashi, Kuriko; Kuwabara, Hideki; Koizumi, Masataka; Endo, Taro; Ito, Miki; Honma, Hiroko; Fukushima, Noboru; Someya, Toshiyuki; Akazawa, Kouhei
Title: Factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in subjects who had suffered from the 2004 Niigata-Chuetsu Earthquake in Japan: a community-based study
  • Document date: 2007_7_24
  • ID: 1pr9q0ww_5
    Snippet: We performed confirmatory factor analysis in order to find the most fitted model. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using AMOS 7 (SPSS Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to test the fits of various models [20] . The candidate models were constructed on the basis of models used in previous studies and those that we found by exploratory factor analysis [5, 7, 16, [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] . Goodness-of-fit of the models was tested by using normal fi.....
    Document: We performed confirmatory factor analysis in order to find the most fitted model. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using AMOS 7 (SPSS Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to test the fits of various models [20] . The candidate models were constructed on the basis of models used in previous studies and those that we found by exploratory factor analysis [5, 7, 16, [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] . Goodness-of-fit of the models was tested by using normal fit index (NFI), Tucker-Lewis coefficient (TLI), comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), Akaike information index (AIC), estimated population discrepancy (F0) and expected cross validation index (ECVI) [3, 4, 26] . Internal consistency of series of items belonging to each factor was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha score [27] . If Cronbach's alpha score of a factor was more than 0.7, we considered internal consistency of the factor to be satisfactory. In that case, we calculated lower scale points for each factor by averaging scales of all items belonging to the factor.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • model fit and RMSEA approximation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • model fit and RMSEA approximation square error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • model fit goodness and RMSEA approximation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • model fit goodness and RMSEA approximation square error: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • model fit goodness and RMSEA approximation square error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • model fit goodness and root RMSEA approximation square error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • model fit goodness and scale point: 1
    • model fit goodness and square error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • model fit test and square error: 1
    • previous study and scale point: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • previous study and square error: 1
    • RMSEA approximation and root RMSEA approximation square error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • RMSEA approximation and square error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • RMSEA approximation square error and root RMSEA approximation square error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • RMSEA approximation square error and square error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • RMSEA approximation square error mean and root RMSEA approximation square error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • RMSEA approximation square error mean and square error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • root RMSEA approximation square error mean and square error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • scale point and square error: 1, 2, 3