Author: Mazumder, Tarikul Huda; Chakraborty, Supriyo
Title: Gaining Insights into the Codon Usage Patterns of TP53 Gene across Eight Mammalian Species Document date: 2015_3_25
ID: 1qtqergw_5
Snippet: Previously, several studies were conducted on synonymous codon usage bias in a wide variety of organisms including prokaryotes and eukaryotes [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] , and till date in many organisms the codon usage patterns have been interpreted for diverse reasons. Many genomic factors such as gene length, GC-content, recombination rate, gene expression level, or modulation in the genetic code are associated with CUB in different org.....
Document: Previously, several studies were conducted on synonymous codon usage bias in a wide variety of organisms including prokaryotes and eukaryotes [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] , and till date in many organisms the codon usage patterns have been interpreted for diverse reasons. Many genomic factors such as gene length, GC-content, recombination rate, gene expression level, or modulation in the genetic code are associated with CUB in different organisms [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] . In general, compositional constraints under natural selection or mutation pressure are considered as major factors in the codon usage variation among different organisms [8, [22] [23] [24] [25] . Moreover, studies revealed that mutation pressure, natural or translational selection, secondary protein structure, replication and selective transcription, hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of the protein and the external environment play a major role in the codon usage pattern of organisms [26] . In unicellular and multicellular organisms it was observed that, preferred synonymous codons/optimal codons with abundant tRNA gene copy number rise with gene expression level within the genome that supports selection on high codon bias confirmed by positive correlation between optimal codons and tRNA abundance [18, 22, 27] . Urrutia and Hurst (2003) reported weak correlation between gene expression level and codon usage bias within human genome though not related with tRNA abundance [19] . However, Comeron (2004) observed that in human genome, highly expressed genes have preference towards codon bias favoring codons with most abundant tRNA gene copy number compared to less highly expressed genes [28] .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- mutation pressure and positive correlation: 1
- mutation pressure and protein structure: 1, 2
- mutation pressure and secondary protein structure: 1
- mutation pressure and selective transcription: 1
- mutation pressure and synonymous codon usage bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- mutation pressure and translational natural selection: 1, 2, 3
- mutation pressure and usage bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
- mutation pressure and usage pattern: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- mutation pressure and usage variation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- mutation pressure natural selection and natural selection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- mutation pressure natural selection and protein structure: 1
- mutation pressure natural selection and secondary protein structure: 1
- mutation pressure natural selection and selective transcription: 1
- mutation pressure natural selection and synonymous codon usage bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- mutation pressure natural selection and translational natural selection: 1, 2, 3
- mutation pressure natural selection and usage bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- mutation pressure natural selection and usage pattern: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- mutation pressure natural selection and usage variation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- natural selection and optimal codon: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date