Selected article for: "asymptomatic infection and nucleic acid test"

Author: Quan-xin Long; Hai-jun Deng; Juan Chen; Jieli Hu; Bei-zhong Liu; Pu Liao; Yong Lin; Li-hua Yu; Zhan Mo; Yin-yin Xu; Fang Gong; Gui-cheng Wu; Xian-xiang Zhang; Yao-kai Chen; Zhi-jie Li; Kun Wang; Xiao-li Zhang; Wen-guang Tian; Chang-chun Niu; Qing-jun Yang; Jiang-lin Xiang; Hong-xin Du; Hua-wen Liu; Chunhui Lang; Xiao-he Luo; Shao-bo Wu; Xiao-ping Cui; Zheng Zhou; Jing Wang; Cheng-jun Xue; Xiao-feng Li; Li Wang; Xiao-jun Tang; Yong Zhang; Jing-fu Qiu; Xia-mao Liu; Jin-jing Li; De-chun Zhang; Fan Zhang; Xue-fei Cai; Deqiang Wang; Yuan Hu; Ji-hua Ren; Ni Tang; Ping Liu; Qin Li; Ai-long Huang
Title: Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients: the perspective application of serological tests in clinical practice
  • Document date: 2020_3_20
  • ID: dm8yl4xu_35
    Snippet: On March 1, 2020, serum samples were collected from these 164 cases for antibody tests. The 16 RT-PCR confirmed cases were positive in IgG or/and IgM. Strikingly, 7 of the 148 cases who were excluded previously by negative nucleic acid results also showed positive results in IgG or/and IgM, indicating that 4.3% (7/162) of close contacts were missed by nucleic acid test. In addition, about 6.1% (10/164) of this cohort were asymptomatic infection......
    Document: On March 1, 2020, serum samples were collected from these 164 cases for antibody tests. The 16 RT-PCR confirmed cases were positive in IgG or/and IgM. Strikingly, 7 of the 148 cases who were excluded previously by negative nucleic acid results also showed positive results in IgG or/and IgM, indicating that 4.3% (7/162) of close contacts were missed by nucleic acid test. In addition, about 6.1% (10/164) of this cohort were asymptomatic infection.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents