Selected article for: "cell infection and host viral membrane fusion"

Author: Suddala, Krishna C.; Lee, Christine C.; Meraner, Paul; Marin, Mariana; Markosyan, Ruben M.; Desai, Tanay M.; Cohen, Fredric S.; Brass, Abraham L.; Melikyan, Gregory B.
Title: Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3 blocks fusion of sensitive but not resistant viruses by partitioning into virus-carrying endosomes
  • Document date: 2019_1_14
  • ID: 15wxk8lt_3
    Snippet: Fusion of enveloped viruses with the host cell membrane is a key step leading to infection. Viral fusion is initiated upon interactions between virus surface glycoproteins and cellular receptor(s) and/or upon the reduction in pH that follows endocytosis (reviewed in [1] [2] [3] ). The extensive conformational changes that ensue in the viral glycoproteins promote fusion between viral and cellular membranes [4] [5] [6] . There is strong evidence th.....
    Document: Fusion of enveloped viruses with the host cell membrane is a key step leading to infection. Viral fusion is initiated upon interactions between virus surface glycoproteins and cellular receptor(s) and/or upon the reduction in pH that follows endocytosis (reviewed in [1] [2] [3] ). The extensive conformational changes that ensue in the viral glycoproteins promote fusion between viral and cellular membranes [4] [5] [6] . There is strong evidence that viral fusion-and membrane fusion in general-proceeds through a hemifusion intermediate defined as a merger of two contacting membrane leaflets without additional merger of distal leaflets that results in the formation of a fusion pore [6] [7] [8] . Accordingly, hemifusion is manifested as lipid mixing between viral and host membranes without viral content release, while full membrane fusion entails mixing of distinct aqueous contents delimited by the two membranes [4] [5] [6] . It has been demonstrated that sub-optimal conditions for membrane fusion including low density of viral glycoproteins, reduced temperature, and-where applicable-insufficiently acidic pH, favor dead-end hemifusion that does not progress to full fusion [9] [10] [11] [12] . Thus, the progression to full viral fusion that culminates in the release of nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm is largely dependent on local conditions. The viral envelope glycoproteins responsible for mediating membrane fusion are targets for neutralizing antibodies and virus entry inhibitors. In addition, new innate restriction factors inhibiting virus fusion have been discovered in recent years [13] [14] [15] . Among these factors is the family of small interferon-induced transmembrane proteins (IFITMs) that exhibits broadrange of antiviral activity [15] [16] [17] . This family includes IFITM1, which localizes predominantly at the plasma membrane, as well as IFITM2 and IFITM3, which contain an endocytic signal in their cytoplasmic N-terminal domain and thus localize to late endosomal and lysosomal membranes [18] [19] [20] [21] . IFITMs effectively block entry of many unrelated enveloped viruses, including orthomyxoviruses (influenza A virus, IAV), paramyxoviruses (Respiratory Syncytial Virus, RSV), flaviviruses (Dengue, West Nile), filoviruses (Marburg, Ebola), and coronaviruses (SARS) [15-17, 20, 22-25] . IFITM3 alone is responsible for the bulk of antiviral effects of interferon in cell culture [15] . Importantly, mice lacking the ifitm3 gene more readily succumb to IAV and RSV infection than control mice [26, 27] . There are, however, viruses that are resistant to IFITM-mediated restriction. Murine Leukemia Virus (MLV), Old and New World arenaviruses (Lassa Virus and Junin Virus, respectively), as well as several enveloped DNA viruses, are not affected by IFITMs [15, 28, 29] .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • antiviral activity and cell culture: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • antiviral activity and cellular viral membrane: 1, 2
    • antiviral activity and conformational change: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • antiviral activity and content release: 1, 2
    • antiviral activity and control mouse: 1
    • antiviral effect and cell culture: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • antiviral effect and conformational change: 1
    • aqueous content and cell culture: 1
    • cell culture and conformational change: 1, 2, 3
    • cell culture and control mouse: 1, 2
    • cellular viral membrane and conformational change: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9