Author: Saarinen, Pekka E.; Kalliomäki, Petri; Tang, Julian W.; Koskela, Hannu
Title: Large Eddy Simulation of Air Escape through a Hospital Isolation Room Single Hinged Doorway—Validation by Using Tracer Gases and Simulated Smoke Videos Document date: 2015_7_7
ID: 15oi1wza_51
Snippet: Perhaps the most eye-catching difference is that in the experimental smoke video the opening door vortex extends further away from the doorway and is shooting more smoke on the left side of the room. This could be one reason for the difference between the measured and the modelled AVM. On the other hand, in the water model experiment by Tang et al. (the latter part of S3 Video in [22] ), the left side of the anteroom is devoid of smoke during doo.....
Document: Perhaps the most eye-catching difference is that in the experimental smoke video the opening door vortex extends further away from the doorway and is shooting more smoke on the left side of the room. This could be one reason for the difference between the measured and the modelled AVM. On the other hand, in the water model experiment by Tang et al. (the latter part of S3 Video in [22] ), the left side of the anteroom is devoid of smoke during door operation and passage, just as in the simulation.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- anteroom left and room left: 1
- door operation and experimental smoke: 1
- door operation and opening door: 1, 2
- door operation and passage door operation: 1, 2, 3, 4
- experimental smoke and opening door: 1
- experimental smoke and room left: 1
- experimental smoke video and opening door: 1
- opening door and passage door operation: 1
- opening door and water model: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date