Selected article for: "control arm and intervention control arm"

Author: Andrews, Denise; Chetty, Yumela; Cooper, Ben S.; Virk, Manjinder; Glass, Stephen K; Letters, Andrew; Kelly, Philip A.; Sudhanva, Malur; Jeyaratnam, Dakshika
Title: Multiplex PCR point of care testing versus routine, laboratory-based testing in the treatment of adults with respiratory tract infections: a quasi-randomised study assessing impact on length of stay and antimicrobial use
  • Document date: 2017_10_10
  • ID: 1sdt9zz8_30
    Snippet: White cell count (×10 9 /L) a 9.6 (6.8-13.7) 9.6 (6.9-13. Fifty-one patients had influenza A virus and/or influenza B virus detected by either the routine assay (21) or by the FilmArray® (30) . Of these patients, 13 of 21 (62%) in the control arm and 24 of 30 (80%) in the intervention arm were given antivirals. The time to the first dose from the time of admission was known for all but one patient in each arm and was considerably reduced in the.....
    Document: White cell count (×10 9 /L) a 9.6 (6.8-13.7) 9.6 (6.9-13. Fifty-one patients had influenza A virus and/or influenza B virus detected by either the routine assay (21) or by the FilmArray® (30) . Of these patients, 13 of 21 (62%) in the control arm and 24 of 30 (80%) in the intervention arm were given antivirals. The time to the first dose from the time of admission was known for all but one patient in each arm and was considerably reduced in the intervention arm: median of 60.4 h in the control arm (IQR 22.7-85.2) and 24 h in the intervention arm (IQR 11.6-33.0). Only one patient in each arm was given empiric antivirals but had a no viruses detected.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents