Selected article for: "host population and rapidly spread"

Author: Neri, Franco M.; Cook, Alex R.; Gibson, Gavin J.; Gottwald, Tim R.; Gilligan, Christopher A.
Title: Bayesian Analysis for Inference of an Emerging Epidemic: Citrus Canker in Urban Landscapes
  • Document date: 2014_4_24
  • ID: 01yc7lzk_11
    Snippet: We consider emerging epidemics, arising, e.g., when a new pathogen is introduced in a host population. In face of the new threat, crucial control measures have to be implemented quickly, yet prior knowledge of the parameters underlying pathogen spread and transmission is often missing. Predictive modelling can greatly help in informing decision making by estimating those parameters from early observations of the outbreak. The important questions .....
    Document: We consider emerging epidemics, arising, e.g., when a new pathogen is introduced in a host population. In face of the new threat, crucial control measures have to be implemented quickly, yet prior knowledge of the parameters underlying pathogen spread and transmission is often missing. Predictive modelling can greatly help in informing decision making by estimating those parameters from early observations of the outbreak. The important questions are then: can a modeller characterise the disease ''soon enough,'' i.e., within a useful time frame, in order to enact the proper control measures? At what stage of the outbreak can the future epidemic progress be reliably predicted? We analyse an outbreak of citrus canker, a wind-spread bacterial disease of citrus, in urban Miami. The model succeeds in capturing the main epidemiological features of the disease, but we find contrasting answers. The spatial scale of disease spread can be identified quickly and accurately from early observations. However, the rate of spread is rapidly changing in time, driven mainly by rare thunderstorms with very short-time predictability, which frustrates epidemic prediction.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • prior knowledge and short time: 1, 2, 3
    • prior knowledge and spatial scale: 1, 2, 3
    • prior knowledge and time change: 1
    • quickly implement and short time: 1
    • quickly implement and time frame: 1
    • rapidly time change and time change: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • reliably predict and time change: 1
    • short time and spatial scale: 1
    • short time and spread rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • short time and time change: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • short time and time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66
    • short time and useful time frame: 1
    • spatial scale and time change: 1, 2
    • spatial scale and time frame: 1
    • spread rate and time change: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • spread rate and time frame: 1, 2
    • spread rate and wind spread: 1, 2, 3
    • time frame and useful time frame: 1, 2, 3