Selected article for: "Charlson score and Chi squared test"

Author: Andrews, Denise; Chetty, Yumela; Cooper, Ben S.; Virk, Manjinder; Glass, Stephen K; Letters, Andrew; Kelly, Philip A.; Sudhanva, Malur; Jeyaratnam, Dakshika
Title: Multiplex PCR point of care testing versus routine, laboratory-based testing in the treatment of adults with respiratory tract infections: a quasi-randomised study assessing impact on length of stay and antimicrobial use
  • Document date: 2017_10_10
  • ID: 1sdt9zz8_29
    Snippet: For all but one of the secondary outcomes, there was no evidence that the intervention had an effect (Table 4) . Only the prescribing decision within 24 h following the diagnostic results under investigation showed evidence of a difference between study arms (Table 5 , p < 0.001, Pearson's Chi-squared test, p-value calculated by 10,000 Monte Carlo replicates). Charlson score a 0 (0-2) 1 (0-3).....
    Document: For all but one of the secondary outcomes, there was no evidence that the intervention had an effect (Table 4) . Only the prescribing decision within 24 h following the diagnostic results under investigation showed evidence of a difference between study arms (Table 5 , p < 0.001, Pearson's Chi-squared test, p-value calculated by 10,000 Monte Carlo replicates). Charlson score a 0 (0-2) 1 (0-3)

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents