Selected article for: "background level and cell line"

Author: Hedegaard, Chris J.; Strube, Mikael L.; Hansen, Marie B.; Lindved, Bodil K.; Lihme, Allan; Boye, Mette; Heegaard, Peter M. H.
Title: Natural Pig Plasma Immunoglobulins Have Anti-Bacterial Effects: Potential for Use as Feed Supplement for Treatment of Intestinal Infections in Pigs
  • Document date: 2016_1_29
  • ID: 1tcpaigw_39
    Snippet: To investigate if natural pig plasma immunoglobulins could interfere with bacterial adhesion to intestinal epithelium an in vitro adhesion-inhibition assay was employed using fluorescently labelled bacteria and a neonatal porcine jejunum derived cell line (IPEC-J2) as a model of the intestinal epithelium. Pre-incubation of fluorescently stained bacteria with ppIgG for 1 hour before adding the bacteria to the IPEC-J2 cells, significantly decreased.....
    Document: To investigate if natural pig plasma immunoglobulins could interfere with bacterial adhesion to intestinal epithelium an in vitro adhesion-inhibition assay was employed using fluorescently labelled bacteria and a neonatal porcine jejunum derived cell line (IPEC-J2) as a model of the intestinal epithelium. Pre-incubation of fluorescently stained bacteria with ppIgG for 1 hour before adding the bacteria to the IPEC-J2 cells, significantly decreased adhesion of both E. coli and S. diarizonae to IPEC-J2 cells. This was observed at 1 mg/ml or more of ppIgG; at 100 mg/ ml IgG fluorescence was at background level indicating complete inhibition of adhesion ( Fig 2) . This indicates that high concentrations of natural pig immunoglobulins interfere with adhesion of both E coli and S. diarizonae to intestinal epithelial cells. reactivity against Escherichia coli and Salmonella diarizonae by competitive ELISA as described (Materials and Methods). ppIgG heated at 60°C or 70°C for 1 hour and PBS were used as control samples. The results are presented as '% inhibition' of the signal obtained in the absence of ppIgG (median values (± median ranges)). Two-way ANOVA (subjected to Bonferonni post-test) was used to observe statistical significance between the treated and untreated ppIgG (***: p<0.01; **: p<0.01).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • adhesion inhibition and cell line: 1, 2
    • adhesion inhibition and Escherichia coli: 1, 2
    • adhesion inhibition assay and Escherichia coli: 1
    • background level and cell line: 1, 2
    • background level and epithelial cell: 1, 2
    • bacteria add and epithelial cell: 1
    • bacterial adhesion and cell line: 1, 2, 3
    • bacterial adhesion and epithelial cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • bacterial adhesion and Escherichia coli: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • cell line and complete inhibition: 1, 2, 3
    • cell line and control sample: 1, 2, 3
    • cell line and epithelial cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • cell line and Escherichia coli: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
    • complete inhibition and Escherichia coli: 1
    • control sample and epithelial cell: 1, 2
    • control sample and Escherichia coli: 1, 2
    • epithelial cell and Escherichia coli: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12