Selected article for: "significant difference and supplementary table"

Author: Cho, A Jin; Lee, Hong-Seock; Lee, Young-Ki; Jeon, Hee Jung; Park, Hayne Cho; Jeong, Da-Wun; Kim, Yang-Gyun; Lee, Sang-Ho; Lee, Chang-Hee; Yoo, Kyung Don; Wong, Ae Kyeong
Title: Post-traumatic stress symptoms in hemodialysis patients with MERS-CoV exposure
  • Document date: 2020_4_15
  • ID: 0a3hx9gb_14
    Snippet: Of the 89 HD patients, 67 (75.3%) completed the questionnaires. Comparisons of respondents and nonrespondents are shown in Supplementary Table 1 . There was no significant difference between the two groups. The participants' mean age was 62.6 years; 46 (68.7%) were men, 31 (46.3%) had diabetes, and 3 (4.4%) had a history of cardiovascular disease. The mean isolation period following exposure was 14.8 days. Single room isolation was implemented fo.....
    Document: Of the 89 HD patients, 67 (75.3%) completed the questionnaires. Comparisons of respondents and nonrespondents are shown in Supplementary Table 1 . There was no significant difference between the two groups. The participants' mean age was 62.6 years; 46 (68.7%) were men, 31 (46.3%) had diabetes, and 3 (4.4%) had a history of cardiovascular disease. The mean isolation period following exposure was 14.8 days. Single room isolation was implemented for 40 (58.8%) subjects; cohort isolation, for 20 (29.4%); and self-imposed quarantine, for 8 (11.8%) subjects. Figure 1 shows the prevalence of IES-R-K≧18 by isolation method. A total of 12 (17.9%) participants reported stress symptoms with IES-R-K scores exceeding cut-off point. Nine out of 40 patients (22.5%) in a single-room isolation group, 3 of 19 patients (15.8%) in a cohort-isolation group and none of the subjects in the self-imposed quarantine group were shown to have post-traumatic stress with IES-R-K≧18. The prevalence rate of IES-R-K≧18 did not differ significantly (P = 0.3) between the single-room and cohortisolation groups. Table 1 shows a comparison of participants by IES-R-K cutoff point. Women and patients who had a shorter duration of isolation were more likely to develop symptoms of IES-R-K≧18.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • prevalence rate and short duration: 1
    • prevalence rate and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • prevalence rate and significantly differ: 1
    • prevalence rate and single room: 1
    • prevalence rate and single room isolation: 1
    • quarantine group and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • room isolation and significant difference: 1, 2
    • room isolation and significantly differ: 1
    • room isolation and single room: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
    • room isolation and single room isolation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
    • short duration and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • short duration and significantly differ: 1, 2, 3
    • short duration and stress symptom: 1
    • significant difference and single room: 1
    • significant difference and stress symptom: 1, 2, 3
    • significant difference and Supplementary table: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • significantly differ and single room: 1, 2
    • significantly differ and single room isolation: 1
    • significantly differ and Supplementary table: 1