Selected article for: "significant difference and total number"

Author: Fernandes-Matano, Larissa; Monroy-Muñoz, Irma Eloísa; Angeles-Martínez, Javier; Sarquiz-Martinez, Brenda; Palomec-Nava, Iliana Donají; Pardavé-Alejandre, Hector Daniel; Santos Coy-Arechavaleta, Andrea; Santacruz-Tinoco, Clara Esperanza; González-Ibarra, Joaquín; González-Bonilla, Cesar Raúl; Muñoz-Medina, José Esteban
Title: Prevalence of non-influenza respiratory viruses in acute respiratory infection cases in Mexico
  • Document date: 2017_5_3
  • ID: 12eyo13f_25
    Snippet: Of the total samples analysed, 312 were positive for at least 1 virus (35.8%), with 47.1% from female patients (n = 147) and 52.9% from male patients (n = 165); there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). Of the total positive samples, RV had the highest number of detections (33.0%), followed by HRSV (30.8%), HMPV (10.6%), HMdV (9.6%), HPIV3 (8.7%), βCoV1 (8.7%), EV (5.8%), and PBpV (4.5%). The other viruses presented percen.....
    Document: Of the total samples analysed, 312 were positive for at least 1 virus (35.8%), with 47.1% from female patients (n = 147) and 52.9% from male patients (n = 165); there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). Of the total positive samples, RV had the highest number of detections (33.0%), followed by HRSV (30.8%), HMPV (10.6%), HMdV (9.6%), HPIV3 (8.7%), βCoV1 (8.7%), EV (5.8%), and PBpV (4.5%). The other viruses presented percentages below 4%, although together they accounted for 10.3% of all positive cases. Only HPIV2 was not detected (Table 3 ) The 3 viruses most often identified in cases of co-infection were RV in 48.3% of the cases, followed by HRSV (35.7%) and HMdV (32.1%). Interestingly, in the case of PBpV, despite it being the causal agent of only 19.6% of co-infections, these co-infections represented 78.6% of the PBpV cases detected. The behaviour of HMdV was similar, with 60% of all cases in which this virus was present involving a combination with other viruses. Both of these cases represent a significant association (p<0.05) with co-infection (Table 4) . The most commonly observed viral combination was HMdV + RV (16.1%), followed by HPIV3 + RV and HRSV + βCoV1 (both 7.1%). Although it occurred only 2 times, the co-infection with 4 viruses involved the same agents in both cases (HRSV + HMdV + βCoV1 + PBpV).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • causal agent and co infection: 1
    • causal agent and high number: 1
    • causal agent and positive case: 1
    • causal agent and significant difference: 1
    • causal agent and virus combination: 1
    • co infection and high number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • co infection and male patient: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • co infection and positive case: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • co infection and positive sample: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • co infection and significant association: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • co infection and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32
    • co infection and total positive sample: 1
    • co infection and total sample: 1
    • co infection and viral combination: 1
    • co infection and virus combination: 1, 2, 3
    • co infection case and high number: 1
    • co infection case and positive case: 1, 2, 3