Author: Perlman, Stanley
Title: Research Driven by Curiosity: The Journey from Basic Molecular Biology and Virology to Studies of Human Pathogenic Coronaviruses Document date: 2015_7_14
ID: 1tyw4msn_6
Snippet: This journey from studies of murine coronaviruses to those of serious human pathogens illustrates the importance of research driven initially by curiosity. In the absence of public investment in research of animal and very mildly pathogenic coronaviruses, we would not have had a basis for developing prophylactic and therapeutic options in humans infected with the SARS or MERS coronaviruses. While working with pathogenic coronaviruses is critical .....
Document: This journey from studies of murine coronaviruses to those of serious human pathogens illustrates the importance of research driven initially by curiosity. In the absence of public investment in research of animal and very mildly pathogenic coronaviruses, we would not have had a basis for developing prophylactic and therapeutic options in humans infected with the SARS or MERS coronaviruses. While working with pathogenic coronaviruses is critical for contributing to human health, it is not always easy. Members of my laboratory conduct all of their work under biosafety and biosecurity conditions that minimize the risk of pathogen release or inadvertent spread. Working under these conditions makes experimental manipulations more complicated and expensive, but these precautions are essential for the work. In addition to training in basic molecular virology and pathogenesis, we and others in the field have developed skills in educating governmental and healthcare authorities as well as the general public about the importance of human coronavirus research. One of the main lessons that the coronavirus community, as well as the public at large, learned from the 2002–2003 SARS outbreak was that the “fear factor†was at least as important as the actual disease. This was emphasized recently in the response to MERS research, in which some individuals focused largely on possible risks to biosafety and biosecurity posed by the studies, without considering the public health consequences of terminating ongoing studies. This response is short-sighted because it is only through basic research into these pathogens that we will be prepared for future outbreaks.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- actual disease and future outbreak: 1
- actual disease and human health: 1
- actual disease and large public: 1, 2
- actual disease and SARS outbreak: 1, 2, 3, 4
- basic molecular virology and molecular virology: 1, 2, 3
- basic molecular virology and pathogenesis basic molecular virology: 1, 2
- basic research and biosecurity biosafety: 1, 2, 3
- basic research and coronavirus community: 1
- basic research and general public: 1, 2
- basic research and human coronavirus research: 1
- basic research and human health: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- basic research and human health contribute: 1
- basic research and human pathogen: 1, 2
- basic research and large public: 1
- basic research and MERS research: 1
- basic research and molecular virology: 1
- basic research and ongoing study: 1
- basic research and pathogen basic research: 1
- basic research and pathogenesis basic molecular virology: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date