Author: Amanda Rojek; Martin Dutch; Daniel Peyton; Rachel Pelly; Mark Putland; Harriet Hiscock; Jonathan Knott
Title: A cross-sectional study of patients presenting for hospital-based screening for COVID-19: risk of disease, and healthcare access preferences. Document date: 2020_4_18
ID: m1e9raz3_12
Snippet: Risk of COVID-19: Whether a patient required screening depended on their travel history, contact with a confirmed case, or belonging to a high-risk group (variably defined due to changing case definitions) (see Table 1 ). Of our cohort, 825 of the 1846 (44.7%) patients met criteria for screening. The proportion of patients each day who met the criteria for COVID-19 testing did not differ greatly or show any discernible pattern over time (see Figu.....
Document: Risk of COVID-19: Whether a patient required screening depended on their travel history, contact with a confirmed case, or belonging to a high-risk group (variably defined due to changing case definitions) (see Table 1 ). Of our cohort, 825 of the 1846 (44.7%) patients met criteria for screening. The proportion of patients each day who met the criteria for COVID-19 testing did not differ greatly or show any discernible pattern over time (see Figure 1 ).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- case definition and confirm case: 1, 2
- case definition and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- case definition and travel history: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- confirm case and high risk: 1, 2, 3
- day patient proportion and patient proportion: 1
- greatly differ and high risk: 1
- high risk and patient proportion: 1, 2, 3
- high risk and require screening: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- high risk and screening criterion: 1, 2
- high risk and testing criterion: 1
- high risk group and require screening: 1
- patient require screening and require screening: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date