Selected article for: "absorption case and administration route regardless"

Author: Kouokam, Joseph Calvin; Lasnik, Amanda B.; Palmer, Kenneth E.
Title: Studies in a Murine Model Confirm the Safety of Griffithsin and Advocate Its Further Development as a Microbicide Targeting HIV-1 and Other Enveloped Viruses
  • Document date: 2016_11_17
  • ID: 096348l5_36
    Snippet: Previous studies have shown that an intravaginal dose of 2 mg/kg GRFT is able to inhibit HSV-2, and we anticipate a similar dose to be used in the case of mucosal prevention of HIV-1. Therefore, we evaluated the toxicity of 2 mg/kg GRFT after intravaginal administration. We were also interested in assessing the toxicity of 2 mg/kg GRFT, administered systemically i.e., subcutaneously or intraperitoneally, to determine the potential adverse effects.....
    Document: Previous studies have shown that an intravaginal dose of 2 mg/kg GRFT is able to inhibit HSV-2, and we anticipate a similar dose to be used in the case of mucosal prevention of HIV-1. Therefore, we evaluated the toxicity of 2 mg/kg GRFT after intravaginal administration. We were also interested in assessing the toxicity of 2 mg/kg GRFT, administered systemically i.e., subcutaneously or intraperitoneally, to determine the potential adverse effects of GRFT in case of absorption. As shown in Figure 6A , the animals displayed similar body weights throughout the experiment, whether treated with GRFT or PBS, regardless of the administration route. The same observation was made for the relative spleen weights ( Figure 6B ). In accordance to these results, no activation of spleen B-or T-cells was found after GRFT administration regardless of the route, as evaluated using B220 and CD69 markers, respectively ( Figure 6C,D) . These results further demonstrated that GRFT has an excellent safety profile as a microbicide.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • administration route and body weight: 1, 2, 3
    • administration route and excellent safety profile: 1, 2
    • administration route and GRFT administration: 1
    • administration route and mucosal prevention: 1, 2
    • adverse effect and body weight: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • adverse effect and previous study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • body weight and excellent safety profile: 1
    • body weight and GRFT administration: 1, 2
    • excellent safety profile and GRFT administration: 1, 2, 3
    • excellent safety profile and intravaginal administration: 1
    • excellent safety profile and intravaginal dose: 1
    • excellent safety profile and mucosal prevention: 1
    • GRFT administration and intravaginal administration: 1, 2
    • GRFT administration and intravaginal dose: 1
    • GRFT administration and mucosal prevention: 1
    • intravaginal administration and mucosal prevention: 1
    • intravaginal dose and mucosal prevention: 1