Author: Chen, Huanzhu; Weng, Huilan; Lin, Meirui; He, Ping; Li, Yazhen; Xie, Qingdong; Ke, Changwen; Jiao, Xiaoyang
Title: The Clinical Significance of FilmArray Respiratory Panel in Diagnosing Community-Acquired Pneumonia Document date: 2017_9_6
ID: 1awz5712_2
Snippet: Nowadays, the golden standard for CAP diagnosis is still based on the chest radiography; however, a broad range of chest radiographic changes could be induced by various agents, a single and dual bacterium/virus, or mixed pathogens coinfections. These alterations of chest radiography are only helpful in specific cases to confirm a microbial cause of pneumonia [4] . Current diagnostic methods identify a pathogen in only 30%-40% of CAP patients [5,.....
Document: Nowadays, the golden standard for CAP diagnosis is still based on the chest radiography; however, a broad range of chest radiographic changes could be induced by various agents, a single and dual bacterium/virus, or mixed pathogens coinfections. These alterations of chest radiography are only helpful in specific cases to confirm a microbial cause of pneumonia [4] . Current diagnostic methods identify a pathogen in only 30%-40% of CAP patients [5, 6] , and the frequent lack of a microbiological diagnosis in CAP impairs pathogendirected antimicrobial therapy [7] . Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique has been shown to be reliable for diagnosing the pathogens, especially for those that are difficult to culture [4] . In addition, PCR method has high sensitivity and specificity in detecting multiple microorganisms and yields results faster than culture and serological methods [8] . Most importantly, the results of PCR are not affected by prior use of antibiotics. The findings indicate that the incidence of viral pneumonia in the past has been underestimated [4] . With multiple PCR assay, detection of multiple RNA or DNA targets in a single tube has the potential for rapid identification of complicated respiratory viral pathogens [9, 10] . The conventional techniques of microbial detection have high accuracy, but they are time-and labor-intensive, with limited range of detection and can be subjective, relying very much on technical expertise for the interpretation of cytopathic effect (CPE) in cell culture [11] . Direct fluorescent antibody assay (DFA) and immunochromatographic antigen testing, although rapid, have poor sensitivity for the detection of most viruses [12] . The serological methods also have low sensitivity. Therefore, an assay that is capable of rapid detection and accurate identification of multiple pathogens is desirable.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- cell culture and chest radiography: 1
- cell culture and CPE cytopathic effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
- cell culture and cytopathic effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- cell culture and diagnostic method: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- cell culture and direct fluorescent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- cell culture and direct fluorescent antibody: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- cell culture and direct fluorescent antibody assay: 1
- cell culture and dna target: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- cell culture and high accuracy: 1, 2, 3, 4
- cell culture and high sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
- cell culture and labor intensive time: 1, 2, 3, 4
- cell culture and limited range: 1, 2, 3, 4
- cell culture and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- cell culture and microbiological diagnosis: 1, 2
- cell culture and multiple rna: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- cell culture and pathogen identify: 1, 2, 3
- cell culture and PCR assay: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65
- cell culture and PCR method: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- cell culture and PCR result: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date