Author: Wang, Shiliang; Sundaram, Jaideep P; Spiro, David
Title: VIGOR, an annotation program for small viral genomes Document date: 2010_9_7
ID: 0lbxvudt_29
Snippet: The results were evaluated by comparison between the gene finder predictions and annotations in GenBank. Sensitivity (Sn) and Specificity (Sp) were employed to evaluate the performance of the programs tested. Sn is defined as the percent correct predictions out of all annotated genes in the dataset. Sp is defined as the percent correct predictions out of all predictions. Correct predictions are those which are the same as the Gen-Bank annotations.....
Document: The results were evaluated by comparison between the gene finder predictions and annotations in GenBank. Sensitivity (Sn) and Specificity (Sp) were employed to evaluate the performance of the programs tested. Sn is defined as the percent correct predictions out of all annotated genes in the dataset. Sp is defined as the percent correct predictions out of all predictions. Correct predictions are those which are the same as the Gen-Bank annotations. Any prediction that was not identical to the GenBank annotation was inspected manually by similarity searching against the NCBI non-redundant (NR) protein database. If the new prediction was highly similar (E value <1e-10) to a viral protein spanning 95% of the homologous protein length, it was categorized as a correct prediction. A partially correct prediction was assigned when the prediction overlapped with the Gen-Bank annotation in the same reading frame but with a different start codon. An incorrect prediction was assigned when the prediction overlapped with the Gen-Bank annotation but in a different reading frame, or cannot be validated by sequence similarity.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- correct prediction and GenBank annotation: 1
- correct prediction and incorrect prediction: 1, 2
- different start codon and GenBank annotation: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date