Author: Romagosa, Anna; Allerson, Matt; Gramer, Marie; Joo, Han Soo; Deen, John; Detmer, Susan; Torremorell, Montserrat
Title: Vaccination of influenza a virus decreases transmission rates in pigs Document date: 2011_12_20
ID: 0q8fedqf_50
Snippet: All seeder pigs were RT-PCR positive at 48 h post inoculation and prior to comingling with the contact susceptible pigs. At that time point, the virus titers from nasal swabs in those pigs ranged from 3 × 10 2 to 1 × 10 5 TCDI 50 /mL. All the contact pigs (100%) in the NV group were found RT-PCR positive by 5 dpc, while in the vaccinated groups, 15 out of 40 pigs (37.5%) in the HE group and none of the pigs (0%) in the HO group were positive by.....
Document: All seeder pigs were RT-PCR positive at 48 h post inoculation and prior to comingling with the contact susceptible pigs. At that time point, the virus titers from nasal swabs in those pigs ranged from 3 × 10 2 to 1 × 10 5 TCDI 50 /mL. All the contact pigs (100%) in the NV group were found RT-PCR positive by 5 dpc, while in the vaccinated groups, 15 out of 40 pigs (37.5%) in the HE group and none of the pigs (0%) in the HO group were positive by RT-PCR (Table 3) . Comparison of the cumulative percentages of contact pigs infected per day between treatment groups via the log-Rank test from the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that the percentage of infected pigs was significantly higher in the NV group than in the vaccinated groups (p < 0.0001), and the distributions did not overlap between 90% confidence intervals ( Figure 2 ).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- log rank and survival analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- log rank and time point: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- log rank test and nasal swab: 1
- log rank test and survival analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65
- log rank test and time point: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- log rank test and treatment group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- nasal swab and pig nasal swab: 1
- nasal swab and survival analysis: 1
- nasal swab and time point: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- nasal swab and treatment group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- nasal swab and vaccinated group: 1
- NV group and susceptible pig: 1
- NV group and treatment group: 1
- NV group and vaccinated group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- survival analysis and time point: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- survival analysis and treatment group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- time point and treatment group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35
- time point and vaccinated group: 1, 2
- treatment group and vaccinated group: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date