Selected article for: "block buffer and buffer block"

Author: STRESMAN, G. H.; STEVENSON, J. C.; OWAGA, C.; MARUBE, E.; ANYANGO, C.; DRAKELEY, C.; BOUSEMA, T.; COX, J.
Title: Validation of three geolocation strategies for health-facility attendees for research and public health surveillance in a rural setting in western Kenya
  • Document date: 2014_5_1
  • ID: 01tncjq0_33
    Snippet: For compounds that were incorrectly located, the median distance to the correct block was 489 m (IQR 229-1036 m), 1036 m (IQR 737-1737), and 1737 m (IQR 1179-2728) for the block only, >500 m buffer, and >1000 m buffer, respectively. The median distance of compounds incorrectly located from the identified cells was 539 m (IQR 236-1095 m), 1055 m (IQR 737-1644) including a 500 m buffer, and 1588 m (IQR 1200-2180 m) including a 1000 m buffer. Moreov.....
    Document: For compounds that were incorrectly located, the median distance to the correct block was 489 m (IQR 229-1036 m), 1036 m (IQR 737-1737), and 1737 m (IQR 1179-2728) for the block only, >500 m buffer, and >1000 m buffer, respectively. The median distance of compounds incorrectly located from the identified cells was 539 m (IQR 236-1095 m), 1055 m (IQR 737-1644) including a 500 m buffer, and 1588 m (IQR 1200-2180 m) including a 1000 m buffer. Moreover, the proportion of people that were correctly identified to a specific block or cell significantly varied per facility (block only, P = 0·007; >500 m, P = 0·003; >1000 m, P < 0·0001).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • cell specific block and specific block: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • identify cell and specific block: 1, 2
    • median distance and people proportion: 1