Selected article for: "infection case and small proportion"

Author: Schanzer, Dena L.; Garner, Michael J.; Hatchette, Todd F.; Langley, Joanne M.; Aziz, Samina; Tam, Theresa W. S.
Title: Estimating Sensitivity of Laboratory Testing for Influenza in Canada through Modelling
  • Document date: 2009_8_18
  • ID: 06boh550_18
    Snippet: As there are many other respiratory pathogens that are not routinely tested for, or reported to the RVDSS, including human metapneumovirus (hMPV), coronaviruses, and rhinoviruses for which patients may seek medical care and present with influenza like illness [29] [30] [31] [32] , a large proportion of negative test results was expected. The overall model fit, and the general consistency of the sensitivity estimates, suggests that these many resp.....
    Document: As there are many other respiratory pathogens that are not routinely tested for, or reported to the RVDSS, including human metapneumovirus (hMPV), coronaviruses, and rhinoviruses for which patients may seek medical care and present with influenza like illness [29] [30] [31] [32] , a large proportion of negative test results was expected. The overall model fit, and the general consistency of the sensitivity estimates, suggests that these many respiratory viruses were reasonably accounted for by the seasonal baseline and that the strong association between the number of influenza positive and influenza negative tests on a weekly basis is indicative of a significant number of false negative results, rather than the activity of another virus or viruses exactly synchronous with influenza. The latter would bias the estimated sensitivity of the system downwards. However, to significantly and consistently bias the estimate, the degree of synchronization would have to be fairly strong, persist over the whole study period, and occur in all provinces. Synchronization was not observed among the RVDSS viruses (influenza A, influenza B, RSV, adenovirus and PIV), and elsewhere other viruses such as rhinovirus, coronavirus and hMPV accounted for only a small proportion of the viral identifications and were not found to be synchronized with influenza [33] . As well, patients may present for care due to a secondary bacterial infection. While any specimen would likely test negative as the virus, at this point, is likely not detectable, the model would statistically attribute a negative test in this case to the primary infection; one of the four RVDSS viruses or to the seasonal baseline that represents other respiratory infections, depending on the level of viral activity at the time of the test. This is not considered a source of bias.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • bacterial infection and estimate sensitivity: 1
    • bacterial infection and influenza number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • bacterial infection and large proportion: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • bacterial infection and medical care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • care present and influenza number: 1
    • care present and large proportion: 1
    • care present and medical care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • care present and medical care seek: 1, 2
    • estimate bias and influenza number: 1
    • estimate bias and likely negative test: 1
    • estimate sensitivity and false negative result: 1
    • estimate sensitivity and influenza number: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • estimate sensitivity and likely negative test: 1
    • estimate sensitivity and medical care: 1
    • false negative result and likely negative test: 1
    • false negative result and medical care: 1, 2
    • influenza number and large proportion: 1
    • influenza number and medical care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • large proportion and medical care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11