Author: Wang, Jia; Yuan, Beibei; Li, Zhengmao; Wang, Zhifeng
Title: Evaluation of Public Health Emergency Management in China: A Systematic Review Document date: 2019_9_18
ID: 0dygete9_23
Snippet: The two reviewers independently screened the literature and conducted a literature quality evaluation. If there were any inconsistencies, they were discussed and resolved first. If any differences persisted, an expert was consulted to assist in the judgment. Ekman's quality evaluation list was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The evaluation includes 7 aspects, i.e., research analysis, rationality, methodology, data, goal achi.....
Document: The two reviewers independently screened the literature and conducted a literature quality evaluation. If there were any inconsistencies, they were discussed and resolved first. If any differences persisted, an expert was consulted to assist in the judgment. Ekman's quality evaluation list was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The evaluation includes 7 aspects, i.e., research analysis, rationality, methodology, data, goal achievement, results, discussion, and conclusions. Each evaluation indicator corresponds to a score; three "*"s indicate high quality research, two "*"s indicate medium quality research, and one "*" indicates low quality research performed.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- conclusion discussion and high quality research: 1
- conclusion discussion and include study: 1
- conclusion discussion and low quality: 1, 2
- conclusion discussion and research analysis: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date