Selected article for: "business pandemic and pandemic influenza"
Author: Watkins, Rochelle E; Cooke, Feonagh C; Donovan, Robert J; MacIntyre, C Raina; Itzwerth, Ralf; Plant, Aileen J
Title: Influenza pandemic preparedness: motivation for protection among small and medium businesses in Australia
  • Document date: 2007_7_17
    • ID: 08gqn86z_26
    Snippet: Beliefs about the risk and severity of pandemic influenza and the amount of time spent considering the impact of pandemic influenza on the business did not differ significantly between states. Beliefs about being able to respond to the threat and perceptions about the need for help did differ between states, with businesses in WA having a significantly lower level of response efficacy and being less likely to need help to prepare than businesses .....
    Document: Beliefs about the risk and severity of pandemic influenza and the amount of time spent considering the impact of pandemic influenza on the business did not differ significantly between states. Beliefs about being able to respond to the threat and perceptions about the need for help did differ between states, with businesses in WA having a significantly lower level of response efficacy and being less likely to need help to prepare than businesses in NSW (Table 1) . Businesses in NSW were also significantly more likely to have a plan for pandemic influenza than businesses in WA (Table 1) ; however, the difference in response rate for the two states renders the generalisability of such differences as tenuous.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • pandemic influenza impact and severity risk: 1, 2
    • pandemic influenza plan and response rate: 1
    • pandemic influenza plan and severity risk: 1, 2, 3
    • pandemic influenza severity risk and response efficacy: 1
    • pandemic influenza severity risk and severity risk: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • pandemic influenza severity risk and WA business: 1
    • perception threat and response efficacy: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • perception threat and response rate: 1, 2, 3
    • perception threat and severity risk: 1, 2
    • response efficacy and severity risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • response efficacy and WA business: 1
    • response rate and severity risk: 1, 2, 3
    • response rate and significantly differ: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • response rate and WA business: 1
    • severity risk and significantly differ: 1, 2, 3
    • severity risk and state differ: 1
    • severity risk and WA business: 1
    • significantly differ and state differ: 1
    • significantly differ and state significantly differ: 1