Selected article for: "chinese hamster and ovary CHO cell"

Author: Elste, James; Kaltenbach, Dominik; Patel, Vraj R.; Nguyen, Max T.; Sharthiya, Harsh; Tandon, Ritesh; Mehta, Satish K.; Volin, Michael V.; Fornaro, Michele; Tiwari, Vaibhav; Desai, Umesh R.
Title: Inhibition of Human Cytomegalovirus Entry into Host Cells through A Pleiotropic Small Molecule
  • Document date: 2020_2_29
  • ID: 031ro01b_31
    Snippet: As described above, SPGG is a highly sulfated agent that can theoretically bind to several HS-binding proteins. One of these proteins is glycoprotein gB of HCMV, which is a known heparin-binding protein [69, 70] . In fact, the design of this work, was based on the expectation that SPGG would bind to one of the viral surface glycoproteins. To test this expectation, we studied whether SPGG binds to gB using dot-blot hybridization and cell-ELISA ass.....
    Document: As described above, SPGG is a highly sulfated agent that can theoretically bind to several HS-binding proteins. One of these proteins is glycoprotein gB of HCMV, which is a known heparin-binding protein [69, 70] . In fact, the design of this work, was based on the expectation that SPGG would bind to one of the viral surface glycoproteins. To test this expectation, we studied whether SPGG binds to gB using dot-blot hybridization and cell-ELISA assay. Figure 6 (panels A,B) shows the results of the dot-blot in the presence and absence of SPGG. As the concentration of SPGG increased to 100 µM, the gB signal reduced 30.5 ± 10% of the untreated control. Although a reduction in signal intensity at lower concentrations (<10 µM) was noticeable, the inhibition was not as robust as observed with IC 50 profiles of viral entry or expression of genes (Figures 3 and 4 above) . To further test whether SPGG engages viral entry glycoprotein gB, we studied Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (CHO-K1) that over-express HCMV gB on cell surface. Dot-blot hybridization and cell-ELISA of CHO-K1 cells in the presence of 100 µM SPGG also led to reduction in gB signal intensity of 34.6 ± 20% in comparison to mock-treated controls ( Figure 6C ).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absence presence and cell elisa dot blot hybridization: 1
    • absence presence and cell surface: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • absence presence and Chinese CHO K1 Hamster Ovary cell: 1
    • absence presence and CHO K1 cell: 1
    • absence presence and CHO K1 cell elisa: 1
    • absence presence and CHO K1 Hamster Ovary cell: 1
    • absence presence and dot blot: 1, 2
    • absence presence and dot blot hybridization: 1
    • absence presence and dot SPGG absence presence blot: 1
    • absence presence and expectation test: 1
    • absence presence and gB signal: 1
    • absence presence and gene expression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • absence presence and Hamster Ovary cell: 1
    • cell elisa and Chinese CHO K1 Hamster Ovary cell: 1
    • cell elisa and CHO K1 cell: 1, 2
    • cell elisa and CHO K1 cell elisa: 1, 2
    • cell elisa and dot blot: 1, 2
    • cell elisa and dot blot hybridization: 1
    • cell elisa and dot SPGG absence presence blot: 1