Author: Wang, Jia; Yuan, Beibei; Li, Zhengmao; Wang, Zhifeng
Title: Evaluation of Public Health Emergency Management in China: A Systematic Review Document date: 2019_9_18
ID: 0dygete9_31
Snippet: The quality of the preliminary inclusion studies was assessed using the Ekman quality assessment tool. In terms of methodology, 60 studies (98.4%) clearly described the health emergency assessment research methods, of which 22 studies clearly indicated the time period of the cross-sectional study. In terms of data, 60 studies' data (98.4%) were derived from original data, while only one study (1.6%) used secondary data. The scores indicated that .....
Document: The quality of the preliminary inclusion studies was assessed using the Ekman quality assessment tool. In terms of methodology, 60 studies (98.4%) clearly described the health emergency assessment research methods, of which 22 studies clearly indicated the time period of the cross-sectional study. In terms of data, 60 studies' data (98.4%) were derived from original data, while only one study (1.6%) used secondary data. The scores indicated that three studies (4.9%) were high quality, and the remaining 58 studies' data (95.1%) were categorized as medium quality research. Overall, most studies were given a rating of 2* according to the Ekman quality assessment tool, which scores between 17 and 21; the research quality of China's health emergency management assessment system is relatively good. The specific results are detailed in Table 2 , and the numbers 1-61 represent the research serial number.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- China health emergency management assessment system and health emergency: 1, 2
- China health emergency management assessment system and health emergency management: 1, 2
- China health emergency management assessment system and health emergency management assessment: 1, 2
- China health emergency management assessment system and health emergency management assessment system: 1, 2
- cross sectional study and emergency management: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- cross sectional study and health emergency: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- cross sectional study and health emergency management: 1, 2
- cross sectional study and high quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- Ekman quality assessment tool and emergency management: 1
- Ekman quality assessment tool and health emergency: 1
- Ekman quality assessment tool and health emergency management: 1
- Ekman quality assessment tool and health emergency management assessment: 1
- emergency management and health emergency: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- emergency management and health emergency management: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- emergency management and health emergency management assessment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- emergency management and health emergency management assessment system: 1, 2, 3, 4
- emergency management and high quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- health emergency and high quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- health emergency and methodology term: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date