Author: Wang, Jia; Yuan, Beibei; Li, Zhengmao; Wang, Zhifeng
Title: Evaluation of Public Health Emergency Management in China: A Systematic Review Document date: 2019_9_18
ID: 0dygete9_31
Snippet: The quality of the preliminary inclusion studies was assessed using the Ekman quality assessment tool. In terms of methodology, 60 studies (98.4%) clearly described the health emergency assessment research methods, of which 22 studies clearly indicated the time period of the cross-sectional study. In terms of data, 60 studies' data (98.4%) were derived from original data, while only one study (1.6%) used secondary data. The scores indicated that .....
Document: The quality of the preliminary inclusion studies was assessed using the Ekman quality assessment tool. In terms of methodology, 60 studies (98.4%) clearly described the health emergency assessment research methods, of which 22 studies clearly indicated the time period of the cross-sectional study. In terms of data, 60 studies' data (98.4%) were derived from original data, while only one study (1.6%) used secondary data. The scores indicated that three studies (4.9%) were high quality, and the remaining 58 studies' data (95.1%) were categorized as medium quality research. Overall, most studies were given a rating of 2* according to the Ekman quality assessment tool, which scores between 17 and 21; the research quality of China's health emergency management assessment system is relatively good. The specific results are detailed in Table 2 , and the numbers 1-61 represent the research serial number.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- China health emergency management assessment system and emergency management: 1, 2
- China health emergency management assessment system and health emergency: 1, 2
- China health emergency management assessment system and health emergency management: 1, 2
- China health emergency management assessment system and health emergency management assessment: 1, 2
- China health emergency management assessment system and health emergency management assessment system: 1, 2
- cross sectional study and emergency management: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- cross sectional study and health emergency: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- cross sectional study and health emergency management: 1, 2
- cross sectional study and high quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- cross sectional study and quality assessment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- cross sectional study and quality assessment tool: 1, 2, 3, 4
- cross sectional study and quality research: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- cross sectional study and research method: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- cross sectional study and research quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- cross sectional study and specific result: 1
- cross sectional study and time period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69
- cross sectional study time period and time period: 1, 2, 3
- Ekman quality assessment tool and emergency management: 1
- Ekman quality assessment tool and health emergency: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date