Selected article for: "difference detect and sample size"

Author: Raina MacIntyre, C.; Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad; Zhang, Yi; Seale, Holly; Yang, Peng; Chen, Joshua; Pan, Yang; Zhang, Daitao; Wang, Quanyi
Title: Viral and bacterial upper respiratory tract infection in hospital health care workers over time and association with symptoms
  • Document date: 2017_8_9
  • ID: 1ckykkob_21
    Snippet: Sample size was based on 95% confidence and 80% power to detect difference between rates of bacterial colonisation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, if we assume 20% of HCWs will have bacterial colonization. These estimates are based on previous studies that describe adult colonisation rates. The sample size was calculated in Epi Info 2000 [26] . In order to allow for loss to follow up, 220 hospital staff members were to be recruited......
    Document: Sample size was based on 95% confidence and 80% power to detect difference between rates of bacterial colonisation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, if we assume 20% of HCWs will have bacterial colonization. These estimates are based on previous studies that describe adult colonisation rates. The sample size was calculated in Epi Info 2000 [26] . In order to allow for loss to follow up, 220 hospital staff members were to be recruited.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • bacterial colonisation and Sample size: 1
    • bacterial colonization and hospital staff: 1
    • bacterial colonization and previous study: 1, 2
    • bacterial colonization and Sample size: 1
    • hospital staff and previous study: 1, 2, 3
    • hospital staff and Sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • loss follow and previous study: 1
    • loss follow and Sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • previous study and Sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18