Author: Cauchemez, Simon; Epperson, Scott; Biggerstaff, Matthew; Swerdlow, David; Finelli, Lyn; Ferguson, Neil M.
Title: Using Routine Surveillance Data to Estimate the Epidemic Potential of Emerging Zoonoses: Application to the Emergence of US Swine Origin Influenza A H3N2v Virus Document date: 2013_3_5
ID: 16c8dwfq_44
Snippet: Up to this point, in the scenario where the detection of a case did not affect detection of other cases from the same cluster (scenario 1), we assumed that cluster information was not available, and thus F could not be calculated. Let's now assume that such information is available and therefore both G and F can be estimated; this allows us to estimate both R and the case detection rate r, as illustrated in the simulation study shown in Figure 6 .....
Document: Up to this point, in the scenario where the detection of a case did not affect detection of other cases from the same cluster (scenario 1), we assumed that cluster information was not available, and thus F could not be calculated. Let's now assume that such information is available and therefore both G and F can be estimated; this allows us to estimate both R and the case detection rate r, as illustrated in the simulation study shown in Figure 6 . First, 12G gives a point estimate for R. Second, once R is estimated, it is possible to infer the case detection rate by determining by how much proportion F differs from proportion G. If the overdispersion parameter k is known (e.g., from detailed contact tracing data), it is possible to accurately estimate the case detection rate; otherwise we can derive informative bounds ( Figure 6 ).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- case detection affect and detection rate: 1, 2, 3
- case detection and cluster information: 1
- case detection and contact tracing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- case detection and detection rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- case detection and point estimate: 1, 2, 3
- case detection rate and cluster information: 1
- case detection rate and contact tracing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- case detection rate and detection rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- case detection rate and point estimate: 1, 2
- case detection rate estimate and cluster information: 1
- case detection rate estimate and detection rate: 1, 2, 3
- case detection rate estimate and point estimate: 1
- cluster information and contact tracing: 1, 2
- cluster information and detection rate: 1
- contact tracing and detection rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- contact tracing and point estimate: 1, 2
- detection rate and point estimate: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date