Selected article for: "evaluation program and experimental group"

Author: Chun, Jin-Young; Seo, Jeong-Hwan; Park, Sung-Hee; Won, Yu Hui; Kim, Gi-Wook; Moon, Sung-Jun; Ko, Myoung-Hwan
Title: Effects of 3-Dimensional Lumbar Stabilization Training for Balance in Chronic Hemiplegic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Document date: 2016_12_30
  • ID: k09j0t98_16
    Snippet: Balance System's evaluation program, the experimental group showed significant improvements in a postural stability test with eyes open and closed under two conditions while the control group showed significant improvements in a postural stability test under a condition with closed eyes and a limit of stability test. As such, the two groups showed similar levels of improvement in terms of stability (Table 3) ......
    Document: Balance System's evaluation program, the experimental group showed significant improvements in a postural stability test with eyes open and closed under two conditions while the control group showed significant improvements in a postural stability test under a condition with closed eyes and a limit of stability test. As such, the two groups showed similar levels of improvement in terms of stability (Table 3) .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Balance System evaluation program and evaluation program: 1, 2
    • Balance System evaluation program and experimental group: 1
    • Balance System evaluation program and stability test: 1
    • control group and evaluation program: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • control group and experimental group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • control group and significant improvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • control group and similar level: 1, 2
    • control group and stability test: 1, 2, 3
    • control group and stability test limit: 1
    • evaluation program and experimental group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • evaluation program and significant improvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • evaluation program and stability test: 1, 2, 3
    • evaluation program and stability test limit: 1
    • experimental group and significant improvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • experimental group and similar level: 1
    • experimental group and stability test: 1
    • experimental group and stability test limit: 1
    • significant improvement and similar level: 1
    • significant improvement and stability test: 1