Selected article for: "data set and high quality"

Author: Delli Ponti, Riccardo; Marti, Stefanie; Armaos, Alexandros; Tartaglia, Gian Gaetano
Title: A high-throughput approach to profile RNA structure
  • Document date: 2017_3_17
  • ID: k23xlzj0_24
    Snippet: From low-(top and bottom 50% of the CROSS score distribution) to high-confidence (top and bottom 5%) predictions, we observed an increase in the accuracies of our models, which indicates good ability to capture strong-signal regions. For instance, the accuracy of the icSHAPE-Mouse model applied to the SHAPE-HIV data set improves from 0.63 (low-confidence) to 0.81 (high-confidence; Figure 1B) , and the same trend is found with respect to other dat.....
    Document: From low-(top and bottom 50% of the CROSS score distribution) to high-confidence (top and bottom 5%) predictions, we observed an increase in the accuracies of our models, which indicates good ability to capture strong-signal regions. For instance, the accuracy of the icSHAPE-Mouse model applied to the SHAPE-HIV data set improves from 0.63 (low-confidence) to 0.81 (high-confidence; Figure 1B) , and the same trend is found with respect to other data sets (Supplementary Figures S4 and S5 We observed comparable cross-validation performances on the PARS datasets (area under the ROC curve AUC of 0.89 for PARS-Yeast applied to PARS-Human, and 0.90 for PARS-Human applied to PARS-Yeast), even though the experiments were carried out in different organisms and with slightly modified protocols, confirming the high quality of our predictions (Figures 2 and 3) .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • auc ROC curve and data set: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • auc ROC curve and good ability: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • auc ROC curve and high quality: 1
    • auc ROC curve and low confidence: 1
    • cross validation performance and data set: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • cross validation performance and high confidence: 1
    • cross validation performance and high quality: 1
    • data set and good ability: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • data set and high confidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • data set and high quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • data set and icSHAPE Mouse model: 1
    • data set and low confidence: 1, 2
    • good ability and high quality: 1, 2
    • high confidence and icSHAPE Mouse model: 1
    • high confidence and low confidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • high confidence and prediction high quality: 1
    • high quality and low confidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • high quality and prediction high quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7