Selected article for: "linear model and random effect"
Author: Hernes, S. S.; Quarsten, H.; Hagen, E.; Lyngroth, A. L.; Pripp, A. H.; Bjorvatn, B.; Bakke, P. S.
Title: Swabbing for respiratory viral infections in older patients: a comparison of rayon and nylon flocked swabs
  • Document date: 2010_9_18
    • ID: ivu632j2_27
    Snippet: Descriptive statistics were used when describing the population. A linear mixed model was applied to the data when comparing the two types of swabs or the origin of the samples with a random effect of patient. The statistical analysis was based on CT values. A CT value of 38 was designated as the cut-off value for positive results. Thus, a lower CT value in a sample corresponds to a higher microbial load in the sample......
    Document: Descriptive statistics were used when describing the population. A linear mixed model was applied to the data when comparing the two types of swabs or the origin of the samples with a random effect of patient. The statistical analysis was based on CT values. A CT value of 38 was designated as the cut-off value for positive results. Thus, a lower CT value in a sample corresponds to a higher microbial load in the sample.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • CT value and linear mixed model: 1
    • CT value and low sample CT value: 1, 2
    • CT value and microbial load: 1, 2
    • CT value and mixed model: 1, 2
    • CT value and population describe: 1
    • CT value and positive result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • CT value and positive result cut value: 1, 2
    • CT value and sample CT value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • cut value and population describe: 1
    • cut value and positive result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • cut value and positive result cut value: 1, 2
    • cut value and random effect: 1
    • linear mixed model and mixed model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • linear mixed model and population describe: 1
    • linear mixed model and positive result: 1
    • linear mixed model and random effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • low sample CT value and sample CT value: 1, 2
    • mixed model and patient random effect: 1
    • mixed model and population describe: 1