Selected article for: "air flow and dependent variable"

Author: van de Hei, Susanne; McKinstry, Steven; Bardsley, George; Weatherall, Mark; Beasley, Richard; Fingleton, James
Title: Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
  • Document date: 2018_3_27
  • ID: iys2ezkd_6
    Snippet: • A robust adequately powered RCT is needed, particularly as this feasibility study identified that rhinothermy improved symptoms of the common cold compared with control. Steam inhalation for symptom relief is a traditional remedy for the common cold. There is a scientific rationale for this treatment because HRV is a temperature sensitive virus with temperature-dependent reduction in viral replication between 33 Study limitations include vari.....
    Document: • A robust adequately powered RCT is needed, particularly as this feasibility study identified that rhinothermy improved symptoms of the common cold compared with control. Steam inhalation for symptom relief is a traditional remedy for the common cold. There is a scientific rationale for this treatment because HRV is a temperature sensitive virus with temperature-dependent reduction in viral replication between 33 Study limitations include variable, and likely ineffective, methods of delivering heated humid air at high flow to the upper airways. These methods include delivery through nozzles held a distance away from the nares and vented anaesthetic masks. The reported intervention durations were also variable. A Cochrane Review assessed that the current evidence could not support or refute effectiveness and recommended that there is a need for robustly designed and adequately powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effectiveness of rhinothermy to treat the common cold.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • anaesthetic mask and common cold: 1, 2
    • anaesthetic mask and feasibility study: 1
    • common cold and current evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • common cold and feasibility study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
    • common cold and high flow: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • control compare and current evidence: 1
    • control trial and current evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • control trial and feasibility study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • control trial and high flow: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • control trial and improve symptom: 1, 2
    • current evidence and feasibility study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • current evidence and high flow: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
    • current evidence and improve symptom: 1
    • effectiveness refute and feasibility study: 1
    • feasibility study and high flow: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • feasibility study and improve symptom: 1