Selected article for: "RNA secondary structure and secondary structure"

Author: Mouzakis, Kathryn D.; Lang, Andrew L.; Vander Meulen, Kirk A.; Easterday, Preston D.; Butcher, Samuel E.
Title: HIV-1 frameshift efficiency is primarily determined by the stability of base pairs positioned at the mRNA entrance channel of the ribosome
  • Document date: 2012_12_15
  • ID: ix8du1er_37
    Snippet: The observed frameshift efficiencies for the 3HJ WT and WT reporter constructs in RRL both fall within the range of previously measured frameshifting efficiencies for HIV-1 in vivo, which range from 2% to 5% (9, 15, 21, 24) . The wide range of observed frameshifting efficiencies in vivo is likely influenced by viral and cellular factors, for example, modulation of translation initiation by the HIV-1 TAR RNA structure (79) and polysome density (53.....
    Document: The observed frameshift efficiencies for the 3HJ WT and WT reporter constructs in RRL both fall within the range of previously measured frameshifting efficiencies for HIV-1 in vivo, which range from 2% to 5% (9, 15, 21, 24) . The wide range of observed frameshifting efficiencies in vivo is likely influenced by viral and cellular factors, for example, modulation of translation initiation by the HIV-1 TAR RNA structure (79) and polysome density (53) . We find that the conserved 3HJ secondary structure in the HIV-1 genomic RNA (54) causes a significant decrease in frameshift efficiency ( Figure 6 ). This observation is consistent with the previous hypothesis that the 3HJ secondary structure induces ribosomal pausing (54) . Pausing at the upstream secondary structure may promote stacking of consecutive ribosomes (80) , promoting a net decrease in frameshift efficiency because the mRNA would have less time to refold between ribosomes. Our data support this model and also indicate that local stability has a far greater impact on frameshift efficiency ( Figure 6 ).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • local stability and secondary structure: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • local stability and significant decrease: 1, 2
    • model support and secondary structure: 1
    • model support and significant decrease: 1
    • model support and translation initiation: 1, 2, 3
    • model support and wide range: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • net decrease and significant decrease: 1, 2, 3
    • ribosomal pause and secondary structure: 1
    • ribosomal pause and translation initiation: 1
    • secondary structure and significant decrease: 1, 2
    • secondary structure and translation initiation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • secondary structure and upstream secondary structure: 1, 2, 3
    • secondary structure and wide range: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • secondary structure and WT WT reporter: 1
    • significant decrease and translation initiation: 1, 2
    • significant decrease and wide range: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • significant decrease and WT WT reporter: 1
    • TAR RNA structure and translation initiation: 1
    • translation initiation and wide range: 1, 2, 3