Author: Mouzakis, Kathryn D.; Lang, Andrew L.; Vander Meulen, Kirk A.; Easterday, Preston D.; Butcher, Samuel E.
Title: HIV-1 frameshift efficiency is primarily determined by the stability of base pairs positioned at the mRNA entrance channel of the ribosome Document date: 2012_12_15
ID: ix8du1er_37
Snippet: The observed frameshift efficiencies for the 3HJ WT and WT reporter constructs in RRL both fall within the range of previously measured frameshifting efficiencies for HIV-1 in vivo, which range from 2% to 5% (9, 15, 21, 24) . The wide range of observed frameshifting efficiencies in vivo is likely influenced by viral and cellular factors, for example, modulation of translation initiation by the HIV-1 TAR RNA structure (79) and polysome density (53.....
Document: The observed frameshift efficiencies for the 3HJ WT and WT reporter constructs in RRL both fall within the range of previously measured frameshifting efficiencies for HIV-1 in vivo, which range from 2% to 5% (9, 15, 21, 24) . The wide range of observed frameshifting efficiencies in vivo is likely influenced by viral and cellular factors, for example, modulation of translation initiation by the HIV-1 TAR RNA structure (79) and polysome density (53) . We find that the conserved 3HJ secondary structure in the HIV-1 genomic RNA (54) causes a significant decrease in frameshift efficiency ( Figure 6 ). This observation is consistent with the previous hypothesis that the 3HJ secondary structure induces ribosomal pausing (54) . Pausing at the upstream secondary structure may promote stacking of consecutive ribosomes (80) , promoting a net decrease in frameshift efficiency because the mRNA would have less time to refold between ribosomes. Our data support this model and also indicate that local stability has a far greater impact on frameshift efficiency ( Figure 6 ).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- local stability and secondary structure: 1, 2, 3, 4
- local stability and significant decrease: 1, 2
- model support and secondary structure: 1
- model support and significant decrease: 1
- model support and translation initiation: 1, 2, 3
- model support and wide range: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- net decrease and significant decrease: 1, 2, 3
- ribosomal pause and secondary structure: 1
- ribosomal pause and translation initiation: 1
- secondary structure and significant decrease: 1, 2
- secondary structure and translation initiation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- secondary structure and upstream secondary structure: 1, 2, 3
- secondary structure and wide range: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- secondary structure and WT WT reporter: 1
- significant decrease and translation initiation: 1, 2
- significant decrease and wide range: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- significant decrease and WT WT reporter: 1
- TAR RNA structure and translation initiation: 1
- translation initiation and wide range: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date