Author: van de Hei, Susanne; McKinstry, Steven; Bardsley, George; Weatherall, Mark; Beasley, Richard; Fingleton, James
Title: Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study Document date: 2018_3_27
ID: iys2ezkd_40
Snippet: [26] The potential advantage of this device for rhinothermy is that it can deliver a 116 consistent temperature, humidity and flow rate direct into the upper airways. The study reported 117 here is a feasibility study of rhinothermy in the treatment of the common cold that will inform the 118 design of a robust RCT of this treatment. The specific aims of the feasibility study were to: 119 1. To estimate the proportions of potential participants a.....
Document: [26] The potential advantage of this device for rhinothermy is that it can deliver a 116 consistent temperature, humidity and flow rate direct into the upper airways. The study reported 117 here is a feasibility study of rhinothermy in the treatment of the common cold that will inform the 118 design of a robust RCT of this treatment. The specific aims of the feasibility study were to: 119 1. To estimate the proportions of potential participants after screening who undergo 120 randomisation, and who then complete the study, in turn providing an estimate of the time 121 and resources required to undertake an RCT. 122 2. To estimate the standard deviation (SD) of the proposed primary outcome variable for the 123 RCT, the modified Jackson score [27-29] so that the sample size for the RCT can be better 124 estimated. 125 3. To estimate the likely minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in modified Jackson 126 score among people with the common cold who are eligible to take part in the study. 127 Participants were eligible if they were between 16 and 75 years old, had common cold 144 symptoms for less than 48 hours at the time of randomisation and a modified Jackson score 145 ≥5.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- clinically important difference and flow rate: 1, 2
- clinically important difference and MCID clinically important difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- clinically important difference and primary outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- common cold and consistent temperature: 1, 2
- common cold and feasibility study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- common cold and flow rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- common cold and flow rate humidity: 1, 2
- common cold and Jackson score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- common cold and potential advantage: 1, 2
- common cold and primary outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- common cold and randomisation time: 1
- common cold and RCT undertake: 1, 2, 3
- consistent temperature and feasibility study: 1, 2
- consistent temperature and flow rate: 1, 2
- consistent temperature and flow rate humidity: 1, 2
- consistent temperature and potential advantage: 1, 2
- consistent temperature and RCT undertake: 1
- feasibility study and randomisation time: 1
- feasibility study and RCT undertake: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date