Selected article for: "correlation coefficient and Spearman correlation coefficient"

Author: Head, Michael G; Fitchett, Joseph R; Cooke, Mary K; Wurie, Fatima B; Hayward, Andrew C; Lipman, Marc C; Atun, Rifat
Title: Investments in respiratory infectious disease research 1997–2010: a systematic analysis of UK funding
  • Document date: 2014_3_26
  • ID: kbzh3trr_8
    Snippet: We used fold differences and statistical tests (nonparametric Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test, Ksample test and nonparametric Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test) to compare total investment, number of studies, mean grant, and median grant according to specific infection, disease system, funding organisation, and cross-cutting categories. Associations between disease burden and research investment were assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rho)......
    Document: We used fold differences and statistical tests (nonparametric Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test, Ksample test and nonparametric Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test) to compare total investment, number of studies, mean grant, and median grant according to specific infection, disease system, funding organisation, and cross-cutting categories. Associations between disease burden and research investment were assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rho). A value greater or equal to 0.7 was considered strongly correlated, greater or equal to 0.40 and less than 0.70 was considered moderately correlated, and a value under or equal to 0.40 was considered poorly

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • correlation coefficient and disease system: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • correlation coefficient and equal value: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • correlation coefficient and nonparametric Wilcoxon Signed rank test: 1
    • disease burden and equal value: 1, 2
    • disease system and fold difference: 1