Author: Delli Ponti, Riccardo; Marti, Stefanie; Armaos, Alexandros; Tartaglia, Gian Gaetano
Title: A high-throughput approach to profile RNA structure Document date: 2017_3_17
ID: k23xlzj0_42
Snippet: We built CROSS using data from SHAPE (5,6) and PARS (3, 4) studies as well as NMR/X-ray experiments. Models based on PARS and icSHAPE experiments show the highest predictive power with an average accuracy of 0.77 and 0.76, and a positive predictive value PPV of 0.8 and 0.77. The different algorithms can be used independently or combined together to obtain insights into the secondary structure of a transcript. Since each technique has its specific.....
Document: We built CROSS using data from SHAPE (5,6) and PARS (3, 4) studies as well as NMR/X-ray experiments. Models based on PARS and icSHAPE experiments show the highest predictive power with an average accuracy of 0.77 and 0.76, and a positive predictive value PPV of 0.8 and 0.77. The different algorithms can be used independently or combined together to obtain insights into the secondary structure of a transcript. Since each technique has its specificities and biases, the combination of multiple approaches is recommendable to achieve a better understanding of structural properties (14) .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- different algorithm and positive PPV predictive value: 1
- different algorithm and PPV predictive value: 1
- different algorithm and predictive value: 1, 2
- different algorithm and secondary structure: 1
- multiple approach and positive PPV predictive value: 1
- multiple approach and PPV predictive value: 1
- multiple approach and predictive value: 1
- multiple approach and secondary structure: 1, 2
- positive PPV predictive value and PPV predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75
- positive PPV predictive value and predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75
- PPV predictive value and predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75
- predictive power and secondary structure: 1
- predictive value and secondary structure: 1, 2
- secondary structure and structural property: 1
- secondary structure and transcript secondary structure: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date