Selected article for: "good agreement and poor agreement"

Title: 2016 ACVIM Forum Research Abstract Program
  • Document date: 2016_5_31
  • ID: 2y1y8jpx_71
    Snippet: When considered site-by-site, agreement in distribution of AIS between LUS and TXR was poor to fair (Κ = 0.25-0.5). However, when considering larger spatial quadrants, agreement between LUS and TXR was good (Κ = 0.45-0.65). Distribution of AIS differed significantly based on final diagnosis for both cardiogenic and noncardiogenic causes of dyspnea. Dogs with mitral valve disease were more likely to have a caudal distribution of AIS (P = 0.0031).....
    Document: When considered site-by-site, agreement in distribution of AIS between LUS and TXR was poor to fair (Κ = 0.25-0.5). However, when considering larger spatial quadrants, agreement between LUS and TXR was good (Κ = 0.45-0.65). Distribution of AIS differed significantly based on final diagnosis for both cardiogenic and noncardiogenic causes of dyspnea. Dogs with mitral valve disease were more likely to have a caudal distribution of AIS (P = 0.0031), while dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy were more likely to have diffuse AIS (P = 0.0008). Patients with airway disease were more likely to have absence of AIS in all sites (P = 0.0006), while patients with pneumonia were more likely to have unilateral AIS (P = 0.0055).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • airway disease and pneumonia patient: 1
    • AIS distribution and final diagnosis: 1, 2
    • AIS distribution and TXR LUS agreement: 1
    • final diagnosis and pneumonia patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
    • final diagnosis and TXR LUS agreement: 1
    • pneumonia patient and site site: 1