Selected article for: "correlation analysis and high correlation"
Title: 2015 ACVIM Forum Research Abstract Program
  • Document date: 2015_5_27
    • ID: 3pnuj5ru_126
    Snippet: Sixty-six cats were enrolled. Inter-rater reliability for BCS and MCS was high (Inter-observer correlation coefficients=0.95 and 0.83). There was no significant effect of order of pressure collection (radial versus coccygeal first). Coccygeal and radial artery pressure were correlated (q=0.45, P < 0.001); differences were not consistently positive or negative (see Figure) . Radial artery pressure was correlated with age (q=0.48, P < 0.001) and MC.....
    Document: Sixty-six cats were enrolled. Inter-rater reliability for BCS and MCS was high (Inter-observer correlation coefficients=0.95 and 0.83). There was no significant effect of order of pressure collection (radial versus coccygeal first). Coccygeal and radial artery pressure were correlated (q=0.45, P < 0.001); differences were not consistently positive or negative (see Figure) . Radial artery pressure was correlated with age (q=0.48, P < 0.001) and MCS (q=0.30, P = 0.016). Based on partial correlation analysis, the association between radial artery pressure and MCS reflected the confounding influence of age. Age was positively correlated with radial artery results (F value=8.0, p = 0.006). Coccygeal artery measurement was not significantly correlated with age, BCS, or MCS.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • artery measurement and coccygeal artery measurement: 1
    • artery measurement and radial artery pressure: 1
    • artery pressure and coccygeal artery measurement: 1
    • artery pressure and radial artery pressure: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • artery pressure and significant effect: 1, 2