Selected article for: "BVD prevalence and cost effectiveness"

Author: ISODA, Norikazu; ASANO, Akihiro; ICHIJO, Michiru; OHNO, Hiroshi; SATO, Kazuhiko; OKAMOTO, Hirokazu; NAKAO, Shigeru; KATO, Hajime; SAITO, Kazuma; ITO, Naoki; USUI, Akira; TAKAYAMA, Hiroaki; SAKODA, Yoshihiro
Title: Assessment of the cost effectiveness of compulsory testing of introduced animals and bulk tank milk testing for bovine viral diarrhea in Japan
  • Document date: 2019_3_1
  • ID: 3ivoabj1_33
    Snippet: This study revealed that a certain proportion of infected cattle could not be removed from the entire population even by monitoring with a highly sensitive test for a long time. This might be due to the retention of PI animals as results of false-negative diagnoses or PI calf delivery from non-PI dams. The prevalence of BVD in cattle decreased to 0.02% in Switzerland and to 0.03% in Germany but could not reach zero [11, 40] . Given the results of.....
    Document: This study revealed that a certain proportion of infected cattle could not be removed from the entire population even by monitoring with a highly sensitive test for a long time. This might be due to the retention of PI animals as results of false-negative diagnoses or PI calf delivery from non-PI dams. The prevalence of BVD in cattle decreased to 0.02% in Switzerland and to 0.03% in Germany but could not reach zero [11, 40] . Given the results of the BVD eradication campaign from field data in these two countries, although the goal should be complete eradication, we need to adjust control measures toward a realistic goal for most of the farmers and stakeholders so as to keep motivations for the implementation high. Therefore, the degree of cost effectiveness, rather than possibility of BVD eradication, would become their major concern.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • BVD eradication and complete eradication: 1
    • BVD eradication and control measure: 1, 2
    • BVD eradication and cost effectiveness: 1, 2
    • BVD eradication and infected cattle: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • BVD eradication and PI animal: 1
    • BVD prevalence and cattle BVD prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • BVD prevalence and control measure: 1, 2, 3
    • BVD prevalence and cost effectiveness: 1, 2, 3
    • BVD prevalence and entire population: 1, 2
    • BVD prevalence and infected cattle: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • cattle BVD prevalence and control measure: 1
    • cattle BVD prevalence and cost effectiveness: 1
    • cattle BVD prevalence and entire population: 1