Selected article for: "analysis effect and discriminant analysis effect"

Title: 2015 ACVIM Forum Research Abstract Program
  • Document date: 2015_5_27
  • ID: 3pnuj5ru_427
    Snippet: In this double-blinded study, Military Working Dogs (n = 48) were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: pla-cebo, probiotic (Bifidobacterium animalis AHC7), or tylosin. Daily routine during the quarantine period, including diet and handlers, was the same for all dogs. A fecal sample was collected at the beginning and the end of the quarantine period for fecal 16S rRNA analysis by Illumina sequencing. Fecal scores were recorded daily.....
    Document: In this double-blinded study, Military Working Dogs (n = 48) were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: pla-cebo, probiotic (Bifidobacterium animalis AHC7), or tylosin. Daily routine during the quarantine period, including diet and handlers, was the same for all dogs. A fecal sample was collected at the beginning and the end of the quarantine period for fecal 16S rRNA analysis by Illumina sequencing. Fecal scores were recorded daily, and dogs were characterized as having diarrhea (fecal score 6-7) or not having diarrhea (fecal score 1-5). Alphaand beta-diversity measures were compared between the three treatment groups before and after treatment and between dogs with and without diarrhea. Differences in bacterial communities were analyzed using unweighted unifrac distance metric. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) test was used to determine if any of the groups studied had significantly different bacterial communities. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) was performed to identify bacterial groups that were significantly associated with treatment.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • discriminant analysis and LDA effect size: 1, 2
    • discriminant analysis and LEfSe LDA effect size: 1
    • discriminant analysis and similarity analysis: 1
    • discriminant analysis and treatment group: 1
    • discriminant analysis and unifrac distance: 1
    • discriminant analysis and unweighted unifrac distance metric: 1
    • discriminant analysis LEfSe LDA effect size and LDA effect: 1
    • discriminant analysis LEfSe LDA effect size and LDA effect size: 1
    • discriminant analysis LEfSe LDA effect size and LEfSe LDA effect size: 1
    • double blinded study and fecal score: 1
    • double blinded study and treatment group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • fecal 16S rrna analysis and rrna analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • fecal sample and LDA effect: 1
    • fecal sample and LDA effect size: 1
    • fecal sample and LEfSe LDA effect size: 1
    • fecal sample and quarantine period: 1