Author: Beigel, John H.; Tebas, Pablo; Elie-Turenne, Marie-Carmelle; Bajwa, Ednan; Bell, Todd E.; Cairns, Charles B.; Shoham, Shmuel; Deville, Jaime G.; Feucht, Eric; Feinberg, Judith; Luke, Thomas; Raviprakash, Kanakatte; Danko, Janine; O’Neil, Dorothy; Metcalf, Julia A.; King, Karen; Burgess, Timothy H.; Aga, Evgenia; Lane, H. Clifford; Hughes, Michael D.; Davey, Richard T.
Title: A Randomized Study of Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza Document date: 2017_5_15
ID: 2g22oqf2_37
Snippet: The use of an ordinal scale of clinical status, using levels of care as was done in our analysis, avoids much of the variation seen in our primary endpoint. While originally developed for use in a different influenza therapeutic study, and while not in the original analysis plan, using this scale we were encouraged to see the significant difference in outcomes between the treatment arms......
Document: The use of an ordinal scale of clinical status, using levels of care as was done in our analysis, avoids much of the variation seen in our primary endpoint. While originally developed for use in a different influenza therapeutic study, and while not in the original analysis plan, using this scale we were encouraged to see the significant difference in outcomes between the treatment arms.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- analysis care level and ordinal scale: 1, 2
- analysis plan and clinical status: 1, 2, 3
- analysis plan and clinical status ordinal scale: 1, 2
- analysis plan and ordinal scale: 1, 2, 3
- analysis plan and original analysis plan: 1, 2, 3
- analysis plan and primary endpoint: 1, 2, 3, 4
- care level and clinical status: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- care level and ordinal scale: 1, 2, 3
- care level and outcome significant difference: 1
- care level and primary endpoint: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- care level and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
- care level and therapeutic study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- care level and treatment arm: 1
- clinical status and ordinal scale: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- clinical status and primary endpoint: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34
- clinical status and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
- clinical status and therapeutic study: 1, 2
- clinical status and treatment arm: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- clinical status ordinal scale and ordinal scale: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date