Title: 2018 ACVIM Forum Research Abstract Program: Seattle, Washington, June 14 - 15, 2018 Document date: 2018_10_25
ID: 60ceejq1_407
Snippet: Both apheresis protocols were managed without adverse reaction to the donors. Immediate post apheresis counts confirmed a consistent harvest of 1.0 x 10 11 +/-1.2 x 10 6 by both devices. Red blood cell contamination was less than 0.6 x 10 6 /ul. White blood cell counts were less than 6.0 x 10 2 . Platelets prepared by the Haemonetics technique had a decrease in pH and increase in lactate when compared to platelets prepared by the Terumo technique.....
Document: Both apheresis protocols were managed without adverse reaction to the donors. Immediate post apheresis counts confirmed a consistent harvest of 1.0 x 10 11 +/-1.2 x 10 6 by both devices. Red blood cell contamination was less than 0.6 x 10 6 /ul. White blood cell counts were less than 6.0 x 10 2 . Platelets prepared by the Haemonetics technique had a decrease in pH and increase in lactate when compared to platelets prepared by the Terumo technique. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Flow cytometric evaluation suggested a higher population of platelets in the 2.53-5.0 micron size range in the concentrates prepared by the Haemonetics technique. There was no significant difference between techniques using standard methodology for evaluation. Both techniques provided platelet concentrates that met acceptance criteria for standard apheresis units.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- cytometric evaluation and flow cytometric evaluation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date