Title: 2016 ACVIM Forum Research Abstract Program Document date: 2016_5_31
ID: 2y1y8jpx_582
Snippet: Urine samples from dogs with TCC/PCA that were treatment-na€ ıve (n = 22) or under treatment (n = 40), dogs with non-neoplastic diseases of the urinary tract (n = 22) or other neoplasms (n = 35), dogs with a urinary tract infection (UTI, n = 45), and a group of healthy control dogs (n = 75) were used. Urinary canine S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were measured in all samples using in-house radioimmunoassays and the uCalR was calculated. All parameters .....
Document: Urine samples from dogs with TCC/PCA that were treatment-na€ ıve (n = 22) or under treatment (n = 40), dogs with non-neoplastic diseases of the urinary tract (n = 22) or other neoplasms (n = 35), dogs with a urinary tract infection (UTI, n = 45), and a group of healthy control dogs (n = 75) were used. Urinary canine S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were measured in all samples using in-house radioimmunoassays and the uCalR was calculated. All parameters were tested among the different groups of dogs using non-parametric multiple-/two-group comparisons. Sensitivities and specificities were determined for the optimal cut-off values, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated. Significance was set at P < 0.05.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- cut value and negative predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
- cut value and NPV negative predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- cut value and optimal cut value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- cut value and optimal cut value determine: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- cut value and predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63
- cut value and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- cut value and specificity sensitivity optimal cut value determine: 1, 2
- cut value and tract infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- cut value and urinary tract: 1
- cut value and urinary tract infection: 1
- different group and group comparison: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- different group and negative predictive value: 1
- different group and NPV negative predictive value: 1
- different group and predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- different group and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- different group and tract infection: 1, 2, 3
- different group and urinary tract: 1, 2, 3
- group comparison and non parametric group comparison: 1, 2
- group comparison and optimal cut value: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date