Selected article for: "control group and infection group"
Title: 2016 ACVIM Forum Research Abstract Program
  • Document date: 2016_5_31
    • ID: 2y1y8jpx_582
    Snippet: Urine samples from dogs with TCC/PCA that were treatment-na€ ıve (n = 22) or under treatment (n = 40), dogs with non-neoplastic diseases of the urinary tract (n = 22) or other neoplasms (n = 35), dogs with a urinary tract infection (UTI, n = 45), and a group of healthy control dogs (n = 75) were used. Urinary canine S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were measured in all samples using in-house radioimmunoassays and the uCalR was calculated. All parameters .....
    Document: Urine samples from dogs with TCC/PCA that were treatment-na€ ıve (n = 22) or under treatment (n = 40), dogs with non-neoplastic diseases of the urinary tract (n = 22) or other neoplasms (n = 35), dogs with a urinary tract infection (UTI, n = 45), and a group of healthy control dogs (n = 75) were used. Urinary canine S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were measured in all samples using in-house radioimmunoassays and the uCalR was calculated. All parameters were tested among the different groups of dogs using non-parametric multiple-/two-group comparisons. Sensitivities and specificities were determined for the optimal cut-off values, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • cut value and negative predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • cut value and NPV negative predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • cut value and optimal cut value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • different group and group comparison: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • different group and negative predictive value: 1
    • different group and NPV negative predictive value: 1
    • group comparison and non parametric group comparison: 1, 2
    • group comparison and optimal cut value: 1
    • negative predictive value and non neoplastic disease: 1
    • negative predictive value and NPV negative predictive value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • negative predictive value and NPV negative predictive value PPV calculate: 1
    • negative predictive value and optimal cut value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5